0
Rational people can disagree over what rights a person may have. Additionally, some rights come directly into conflict. The Right to Free Speech directly goes against the Right of Reputation. Absolute Property Rights directly go against Welfare Rights. Finally, like all natural sciences that came out of the Enlightenment, they need to be refined and reexamined. Unlike religious law, they are not to be accepted as they are immediately.
What else can I help you with?
What does the human rights act say about health and safety?
Nothing
Where does human rights come from?
Mostly the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights. Those who are people of faith say from God's gift of the Ten Commandments
What did the declaration of human rights say?
The declaration stated that all people have certain human rights that should be respected by ''all peoples and all nations.''
What are the roles of the government and the individual citizen in the declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen?
consider using inclusive language in your question. You could say - "the rights of citizens" - which for many would include women, men & children - or say "human rights" What are the roles of government and the individual in the declaration of the human rights?
How do you say human rights in Spanish?
You say 'derechos humanos' or 'derechos por la humanidad'
How would life in America be different if we did not have the Bill of Rights?
it would be hard to say what we think or feel
What should you say to someone who didn't win an award?
You can say something like, "I'm proud of your hard work and effort, and remember that awards don't define your worth or talent."
What document protects the rights of people?
please name of country! I cant say it is US but the law of human rights is the one that is counting in most countryes
What are the pros and cons of sovereignty?
A con is that it can abuse human rights pro is that the state is independent and people have a say .
Did John Stuart Mill define freedom using rights theory?
Short answer: Yes, But. I would say that his theory of moral rights is based around Utilitarianism (i.e. what is right = what brings about Utility and thus greatest happiness.) They aren't rights in a natural sense. Try http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Rights
An example of a cliché from Elizabethan poetry that the metaphysical poets might have wanted to avoid?
It's really hard to say, primarily because A) Shakespeare B) "Metaphysical" is hard to define, it could mean a lot of things.
Why is it so hard to measure development?
This is because it is hard to tell which indicator one has to use to measure development. For example, should you only focus on human development, GNP of the country, or equal participation in political participation?. From what I have read so far, the UNDP is focusing on the Human Development index to measure development which, according to me is not enough to measure development. For example, if you take a look at the 2006/2007 data, Myanmar is more developed than India and China, a country with gross human rights violation and almost no human Rights accountability is claimed to be more developed than countries like India. So, I would say that finding the right indicator is a hard thing to do in this regard. P.s, I am not Indian and there is no bias to my comment.
