The idea that the life of an individual is less important than the well-being of society is often rooted in utilitarian principles, where actions are judged by their outcomes for the greater good. However, many argue that individual rights and dignity are fundamental and should not be sacrificed for collective goals. Balancing individual needs with societal well-being is crucial, as a thriving society often depends on the flourishing of its individuals. Ultimately, the relationship between individual and societal importance is complex and context-dependent.
The argument that the well-being of society is more important than the life of an individual often hinges on the idea that a thriving society creates the conditions for the greatest good for the greatest number. When individual interests conflict with the collective needs, prioritizing societal well-being can lead to advancements in health, safety, and prosperity for the majority. Additionally, a stable and healthy society can support and enrich individual lives, suggesting that the collective benefit ultimately enhances individual existence. However, this perspective can be controversial, as it risks undervaluing the inherent dignity and rights of individuals.
1. The benefit to each individual is less than the cost that each would have to pay if it were provided privately, and 2. the total benefits to society are greater than the total cost.
No, having a disability does not make life less important. Every individual's life has intrinsic value, regardless of their abilities or challenges. People with disabilities contribute uniquely to society and can lead fulfilling, meaningful lives. It’s essential to recognize and celebrate the diversity of human experiences.
Generally, they were less important. They didn't have important roles in society, chances are, they didn't have any real power or authority either. The Titanic crew had to get the people who were 'important to society' out first.
The idea that the well-being of society is prioritized over the life of an individual often stems from a utilitarian perspective, which values the greatest good for the greatest number. In this view, the health and stability of the community can lead to greater overall happiness and security, justifying sacrifices for the collective. However, this perspective can be contentious, as it risks overlooking individual rights and dignity, raising ethical questions about the value of human life. Ultimately, a balance must be struck between individual needs and societal welfare to foster a just and equitable society.
Its important because they show trends (growth) in data. Individual data points are less important than what you see when you put all the data together.
I found one important effect: People will talk less about the news, local or global.
ESL refers to English as a second language. This would be an instructor that would teach newcomers to our country how to speak English. They are important to society as they help newcomers adjust to the language with less stress as if they were in a regular English class.
I believe Coco Chanel's purpose for creating such revolutionary styles for women in that era was to open the women to the world. It was to create a different role for the women in society. It was to create an independent woman that was not meant to stay and home and produce children, she [women] solely as an individual had an important role in society. With the creation of new less restricting clothes came a sense of confidence and leadership.
Society is now more educated and feels for the less fortunate. Now days society is less prejudice, and more accepting.
It is important because it is "less" subject to being flexible in the favour of the ruling class in a society. If somthing is written down and one violates the law then they are punished
"less important" = "moins important"