Industrialists where paying off government officials to look the other way.
Why not
Organized labor and industrialists benefited from the need to support the war effort through the "no strike pledge," which ensured labor peace and allowed factories to operate at full capacity, thus increasing production. This collaboration helped to stabilize the workforce and maintain industrial output crucial for the war. Additionally, both groups gained recognition for their contributions, with labor securing better wages and conditions in return for their support, while industrialists enjoyed increased profits from government contracts and production demands. Overall, this partnership fostered a sense of unity and shared purpose during a critical time.
False. Employers exchanged blacklists of union members to prevent them from getting jobs and were employed to crush strikes.
What did the government do during strikes and other labor management conflicts of the late 1800's?
They do not have taka
Immigrants in the late 19th century were welcomed by industrialists because they provided a vast and inexpensive labor force essential for rapid industrial expansion. These newcomers were often willing to work for lower wages than native-born workers, which helped keep production costs down. Additionally, the influx of immigrants supported the growing demand for labor in factories, railroads, and construction, enabling industrialists to maximize profits during a period of significant economic growth.
The term "robber barons" was commonly used by critics, including journalists, labor leaders, and political reformers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, to describe wealthy industrialists and businessmen who were perceived to exploit workers, manipulate markets, and engage in unethical practices for personal gain. Figures such as Upton Sinclair and Mark Twain highlighted the negative impacts of these industrialists on society. Labor unions and reform movements also used the term to rally support against the perceived greed and corruption of these powerful elites.
They usually sided with the government.
The negative term often used to describe industrialists of the age, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, is "robber barons." This term implies that these industrialists amassed wealth through exploitative practices, including unfair labor conditions and monopolistic tactics. Critics accused them of prioritizing profit over social responsibility, contributing to economic inequality and social unrest.
THey were forced to work, mostly against their will.
Child labor increased so that industrialists saved money.
The government remained neutral during labor actions, preferring to let factory owners handle each situation.