Yes, there is discrimination between the rich and poor. Throughout history, this paridigm has proven true and it's more obvious these days with the have's and havenot's.
In 1912, the differences between the poor and the rich were stark. The rich had access to better education, healthcare, and living conditions, while the poor often struggled with low wages, limited access to resources, and poor living conditions. Social divides were prominent, with the wealthy enjoying more opportunities and privileges than the poor.
Power dynamics between rich and poor countries are influenced by factors like economic strength, political influence, and military capabilities. Rich countries often have greater power due to their wealth and resources, which can lead to unequal relationships where poorer countries may be dependent on them for aid, trade, or political support. This imbalance of power can result in exploitation, unfair negotiations, and challenges in bridging the gap between rich and poor nations.
Samuel De Champlain's family was poor. In fact most of the families in France was poor. I am not from France but I would say that the Catholic churches were rich.
In 1920, the treatment of the poor by the rich varied greatly depending on individual beliefs and societal norms. Some rich individuals and organizations may have shown kindness and offered support to the poor through philanthropy and charity work, while others may have perpetuated social inequalities by exploiting or neglecting the poor. The overall relationship between the rich and the poor in 1920 would have been influenced by historical, cultural, and economic factors of that time.
Since 1960, the wealth gap between the rich and the poor has generally increased in many countries around the world. Factors such as globalization, technology advancements, and changes in economic policies have contributed to this widening gap.
It is suicide because in Indians or you can say poor or middle class Indians don't like discrimination between them and rich freaks
Canada does have a middle rich and poor class. :)
The heavy stratification between the rich and poor class has created a somewhat symbiotic relationship. The poor are a huge worker and consumer resource for the rich, which in term keeps the rich wealthy enough to continue to use that resource.
The upper class were rich, were as the lower were poor.
No they were the poor class. Patricians were rich.
She was not rich but I don't know if she was poor or middle class but I think it's middle class
Rich
poor or middle class
it was split into mainly two societies; the rich and poor. The rich would talk to the rich and the poor to the poor.
She was neither rich nor poor, she was in a middle-class family.
was benjamin banneker rich or poor or middle class
The income gap is the gap between the rich and the poor. We call that gap the middle class.