Yes they have ! The Shah of Iran comes to mind. Every South Vietnamese president. The current Govt. in Iraq(2008) The Saudi Royal family, and on and on and on ! Whom ever reads this I have left many for you to think of. There are plenty left ;) Yes, including Iraq under Saddam Hussein.
Yes, historically the US has supported various corrupt authoritarian regimes around the world for strategic reasons, especially during the Cold War. This support was often driven by geopolitical considerations rather than a commitment to democracy or human rights.
Regionalization in the Philippines is important because it allows for the empowerment of local governments, facilitates more efficient administration of resources, and promotes development tailored to the unique needs and characteristics of each region. By decentralizing power and decision-making, regionalization also fosters better representation of diverse communities and enhances overall governance and service delivery.
Approximately 2% of the US population identifies as Jewish.
About 30% of the US population has a 4-year degree.
Approximately 3% of the total US population lives in Michigan.
1st: China 2nd: ? 3rd: US
Please see the two Related Questions below that address the two prongs of this question.
The US supported both Machado and Batista, sending both military and monetary support despite the brutality of their regimes.
The primary effect on the US of US foreign policy is the expansion of US interests overseas. There are two primary goals of the US in the Middle East: petroleum acquisition and defense of Israel. Supporting dictators like Mubarak meant that the oil kept flowing and that Israel had peace.
Vermont is often considered one of the least corrupt states in the United States. It consistently ranks low on corruption perception indexes and has a reputation for transparency and accountability in government.
The Cold War developed from the conflict between the US and the USSR, which sought to become the dominant world power. The US opposed all communist governments, while the USSR supported many, and established puppet regimes in Eastern Europe.
The US Government supported the Korean War.
Authoritarian governments have permission to do whatever while the US government have limitations on what they are allowed to do and the citizens make most of the decisions.
The US backed the Shah of Iran who was an authoritarian monarch.
by not being corrupt by not being corrupt Give everybody at least $1,000,000.
The US supported resistance to communism, so it backed the faction in the South, while Russia and China backed the faction in the North. The same had occurred earlier with North and South Korea. South Vietnam became a nominal democracy but an unpopular authoritarian regime, and after the US withdrew its aid, it was overrun by the forces of North Vietnam in 1975.
They certainly do, especially the political systems. For example, being a Presidential Republic has had a profound impact on US American identity, resulting in the general mainstream ideas about equality, justice, and personal freedoms which are concepts that are substantially less popular in authoritarian regimes.
Answer: Liar, corrupt...