Yes, Rajbhar is a surname belonging to the Scheduled Caste category in India, specifically in states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Members of the Rajbhar community are often recognized as being disadvantaged socially and economically.
"Santra" as a surname does not specifically belong to any particular caste. Surnames in India can be shared across different castes and communities. It is important to consider the regional and cultural context when determining the caste associated with a surname.
yes of course . Shinde comes almost in every cast including Brahmin
no ... it is generally a brahmin surname Well its generally depends upon where is the person from actually, My Best friend's sure name is Bharti and she is from UP and she is SC.
No, it is not a Schedule Cast, it belongs to "Arora" category. They don't belong to Khatri tribe because they are originally from India and does not came from Pakistan/Undivided India.
Yes, Sarkar can be a surname associated with individuals from Scheduled Castes in India. However, it is important to note that surnames can be used by people from various social and caste backgrounds, so the surname alone does not definitively indicate caste status.
No, Dhojiya surname is belong to Rajput caste
The Karki is a Chhetri surname in Nepal and Rajput cast of North India.
the surname khichy belong to Rajput family .
no
No
no
Kapu
these are kayastha
Which cast belong pandav surnem
I am bhatti and I am from schedule cast so answer is yes bhatti are also in schedule casts
No. Kundu is one of the highest rank cast in Bengali(Kayashta/Tili). They may be business man or may be involved in agriculture. But they don't belong to SC, ST or OBC.
It belongs to Suri Caste .