yes
Caste hierarchy can vary depending on regions and communities in India. In some regions, Jats might be considered higher caste than Sainis, while in others the hierarchy could be different. It's important to remember that caste distinctions are a social construct and not indicative of individual worth or capabilities.
In the traditional Indian caste system, Baidyas are considered higher in the hierarchy compared to Kayasthas. Baidyas are classified as Vaishya (merchant) while Kayasthas are classified as Shudra (worker), based on their historical occupations. However, it's important to note that the caste system is an outdated social structure and not relevant in modern society.
Caste systems vary regionally in India, so it is not accurate to compare the two castes on a hierarchy. Both Jatav and Katiyar belong to different caste groups, and their social status can be influenced by various factors like region, occupation, and historical context.
No. This belongs to the caste which is below brahmins but above kayastas. However the are most likely brahmins.
There is no universal measure of the size of different castes as it can vary depending on location and population demographics. Both Jatav and Katiyar castes are significant in certain regions of India, and their size can be comparable depending on the context.
Yes very higher
Both are equal . Raghav and Tanwar both share blood relation being Rajputs. Kindly don't ask such patriarchial or controversial questions . Promote Brotherhood rather than spreading hatred in terms of who is bigger or smaller. Raghav are Sooryavanshi Rajputs . Tanwar or Tomar are Puruvanshi Rajputs. It should also be kept in mind that Tanwar or Tomar surname is also commonly found among Jaats and Gurjars . So a person writing Tanwar or Tomar surname doesn't necessarily means he is a Rajput. Though this is not the case with Raghav Rajputs. Their population is relatively low as compared to Tomars. And their surname is generally not found in any other caste. JAI HIND.
Higher than Jatts
yes
Caste hierarchy can vary depending on regions and communities in India. In some regions, Jats might be considered higher caste than Sainis, while in others the hierarchy could be different. It's important to remember that caste distinctions are a social construct and not indicative of individual worth or capabilities.
Its heart broken when people talk about the caste and the subjugation of certain community? How the other caste bullshits assuming they are higher than them?? I am totaly dislike while people talk on this discrimination..
because some are of a higher group than others in the caste system.
In the context of Indian caste dynamics, the Saithwar community is generally considered to be of a higher social status than the Jat community. However, caste hierarchies can vary significantly by region and locality, and social status can also depend on various factors, including economic conditions and political influence. It's important to note that caste distinctions are complex and can evolve over time.
May be, but today in most part of the India and Pakistan they Enjoy same social status.
In the traditional Indian caste system, Baidyas are considered higher in the hierarchy compared to Kayasthas. Baidyas are classified as Vaishya (merchant) while Kayasthas are classified as Shudra (worker), based on their historical occupations. However, it's important to note that the caste system is an outdated social structure and not relevant in modern society.
Caste systems vary regionally in India, so it is not accurate to compare the two castes on a hierarchy. Both Jatav and Katiyar belong to different caste groups, and their social status can be influenced by various factors like region, occupation, and historical context.
She is in a lower caste than you, so you cannot marry her.