maybe sainis will be higher then jatt as they have more closeness to rajputs
No, surnames are not definitive indicators of caste in all cases. Caste can vary within surnames and is not solely determined by a person's last name. It is important to recognize individuals based on their skills, character, and actions rather than assumptions based on their surname.
No. This belongs to the caste which is below brahmins but above kayastas. However the are most likely brahmins.
Caste systems vary regionally in India, so it is not accurate to compare the two castes on a hierarchy. Both Jatav and Katiyar belong to different caste groups, and their social status can be influenced by various factors like region, occupation, and historical context.
There is no universal measure of the size of different castes as it can vary depending on location and population demographics. Both Jatav and Katiyar castes are significant in certain regions of India, and their size can be comparable depending on the context.
Both Tomar and Bhadoria are sub-castes within the broader Kshatriya varna in the Indian caste system. There is no hierarchy between them in general, as caste hierarchies can vary across regions and communities.
i think jatt are better than all
Higher than Jatts
No. Kumar is not a caste specific name. Sainis are a separate caste group than Jatts.
Kamboh are not totally considered as chamar but they are also belong to the backward class agriculture caste but as non jatt . Kamboh can easily assimilated with Chamar than to jatt. inter caste marriages between kamboh and Chamar are common in Punjab and Haryana
No, surnames are not definitive indicators of caste in all cases. Caste can vary within surnames and is not solely determined by a person's last name. It is important to recognize individuals based on their skills, character, and actions rather than assumptions based on their surname.
Honey Singh, whose real name is Hirdesh Singh, is a Punjabi rapper, singer, and music producer known for his work in the Indian music industry. The term "Jatt" refers to a community or caste primarily associated with the Punjab region of India. While Honey Singh has not publicly disclosed his caste or community affiliation, it is important to note that an individual's talent, work, and contributions should be the focus rather than their caste or background.
In Sikhism, "caste" is not a recognized concept, as the faith emphasizes equality and rejects the hierarchical caste system present in some other religions. However, within the Sikh community, individuals may identify with their cultural or regional background, such as being a Jatt, which is a farming community traditionally associated with Punjab. Therefore, while Dayal may identify as a Sikh from the Jatt community, it is important to understand that this identification is based on cultural heritage rather than a caste system within Sikhism.
By Origin yes Sainis are above jatts. Jatts are refugee tribe of India came from Kazakistan. Sainis are vedic kshytriya and belong to Mathura from Maharaja Shoorsen (grandfather of Lord Krishna).
Gangar are majorly Khatri (kshatriya) from Punjab doaba region. Gangar Jatt/Tarkhan are also there. Most are in farming and trade. But , now no caste should be considered higher or lower.
Sikhism explicitly outlaws any caste-based stratification of society. Caste- or nobility-based surnames are therefore not allowed for Sikhs. And therefore, you cannot claim to be both a Sikh and a Jatt. This-as well as the obvious reason that there is no such thing as a uniquely "Sikh" surname other than Singh (for males) and Kaur (for females)-renders the question of "Raj" moot.
No
No, "saggu" is not a recognized caste in the traditional Indian caste system. Caste refers to a social class or hierarchy that is determined by birth, and saggu does not fall into any of the established caste categories. It is possible that "saggu" could be a surname or a regional identifier, but it is not inherently a caste designation.