That's a statement.
The word for a man who does not think women are equal is "sexist." This term refers to someone who believes in the superiority of one gender over the other and discriminates against individuals based on their gender.
Yes, there are more people in the world than animals. The global human population is estimated to be over 7 billion, while the total number of animals is much higher but varies greatly depending on the species.
Yes, it is estimated that over a 1000 animals die every year due to various reasons such as natural causes, accidents, diseases, climate change, habitat destruction, and human activities like poaching and pollution. The exact number can vary depending on the species and the specific circumstances.
Social Darwinism used the concept of "survival of the fittest" to justify racial superiority, arguing that certain races were more evolved and therefore more fit to dominate others. This led to the resurgence of beliefs in the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race, both domestically and internationally, as a way to justify colonial expansion and reinforce existing power structures.
Male chauvinist is a term often used to describe someone who believes in the superiority of men over women. Another synonym could be misogynist, which refers to someone who holds a strong dislike or prejudice against women.
man can talk
We, I should say most humans, have an intellectual superiority over animals.
The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.The blood sports such as wild beast fighting and gladiatorial combat demonstrated Rome's superiority over nature and man. The beast fighting, speaks for itself, but the gladiatorial fighting evolved from a "mundus" or duty to a dead relative, to the vanquishing of prisoners of war or decadent slaves, which demonstrated Rome's superiority over her enemies. Over time the gladiators became professional but the superiority in combat was still an undercurrent in the games.
He suffers from a superiority complex. Our team will win because of our superiority on the field.
The brain.
Air superiority
Prehistoric man had ability over animals mainly because of it's opposable thumbs and capacity to make and hold tools and weapons, and form hunting tactics.
An air superiority is an accepted dominance in the air of one side's forces over another during a military campaign.
An air superiority is an accepted dominance in the air of one side's forces over another during a military campaign.
Authenticism is the belief in the superiority of the authentic over the inauthentic.
Man is hunting these animals. While their numbers are climbing over the past 100 years, they are now being allowed to be hunted again, which is why they were endangered at one time. Hopefully, man has learned from previous mistakes and will not over hunt these animals again. The short answer is yes, they are in danger from man.
donno this someone answer plz