Elitist -Apex
A functionalists would argue that everything in society has a function that in the end makes up society as a whole. They would argue that conflict has a function in society. A conflict theorists would argue that conflict is not a function of society but an actual natural trait of society.
In conclusion, the theories of law in nature sociology argue that laws are inherent to human behavior and social organization, reflecting innate principles of justice. Meanwhile, Marxist theories view law as a tool used by the ruling class to maintain power and perpetuate inequality. Both perspectives offer valuable insights into the role and function of law in society, highlighting the complex interplay between nature, social structures, and power dynamics.
Davis and Moore argue that an egalitarian society is unlikely because some form of social stratification is necessary to ensure that society's most important jobs are filled by qualified individuals. They believe that this stratification is necessary for the efficient functioning of society.
Herbert Spencer, an early sociologist, is often criticized for overemphasizing the natural science model in his sociological theories. Spencer applied principles of evolution and natural selection to society, which led to his belief in the survival of the fittest and a laissez-faire approach to social problems. Critics argue that this approach oversimplifies the complexities of human society and ignores the role of social institutions and structures in shaping behavior.
Davis and Moore proposed that stratification is inevitable in society because they believe that it is functional and necessary for the smooth functioning of society. They argue that stratification helps ensure that the most qualified individuals hold the most important positions in society, leading to greater efficiency and stability. In their view, stratification is a mechanism for ensuring that the most talented and skilled individuals are incentivized to occupy the most critical roles in society.
Elitist
Elitist -Apex
Revolutions
Pluralist
Dont argue
The major difference between political theories lies in their beliefs about the role of government in society. Some theories advocate for a strong, centralized government that provides for the needs of its citizens, while others argue for limited government involvement and emphasize individual freedoms and rights.
Pluralist theories of power argue that power is dispersed among various groups and individuals in society, rather than being concentrated in the hands of a small elite group. Pluralist theorists believe that power is distributed across different stakeholders, interest groups, and institutions, leading to a more decentralized and democratic distribution of power. They emphasize the role of competition and negotiation among these diverse actors in shaping public policy and decision-making processes.
yes
Many people may disagree with biological theories of gender differences because these theories can oversimplify complex social phenomena, ignore individual and cultural variability, and perpetuate harmful stereotypes about gender. Additionally, some may argue that focusing solely on biology can neglect the important influence of social factors on shaping gender roles and behavior.
There are two interpretations of your question: 1. Why does my boyfriend argue with me first and then argue with the people who cause us problems? 2. Why does my boyfriend argue with me rather than with the people who cause us problems? Which is it?
He demanded overthrow of autocracy and advocated socialist society.
A functionalists would argue that everything in society has a function that in the end makes up society as a whole. They would argue that conflict has a function in society. A conflict theorists would argue that conflict is not a function of society but an actual natural trait of society.