There is no "moral right" in Cultural Relativism. That is the entire point of the philosophy; all value systems in all cultures are equally valid.
(Apex Learning) Brushing teeth in the morning.
The four functional imperatives according to Parsons: Adaptation, Goal Attainment, Integration, Latency with the acronym A.G.I.L.
Social facts are cultural norms and values. Social action is an act that takes others' actions and reactions into account. For example, going to your brother's wedding even though you don't like the bride could be in response to social facts, if it's just expected by society that you will do so, or it could be a social action, if you're going just to keep your mom from getting upset.
Law is a cultural system of norms or principles laid down by a governing body that regulates all human activity. A law is a specific norm or principle that compels a person to perform a particular right action or forbids that person from performing a particular wrong action. The study of law is known as jurisprudence. Law is a product of human culture emanating ultimately from moral philosophy and religion.
Discrimination is Thought's against the action. Prejudice: Action.
Cultural Relativism prevents people from being able to determine which course of action is proper because the terms "right" and "wrong" become meaningless. People becomes immune to simple arguments of an act's morality or immorality because different cultures are different.
No affirmative action is morally defensible.
i believe you are referring to cultural relativism, whereby different cultures have different norms and values, therefore it is hard to apply certain theories as universal
no
no
Positive Negative Whatever you believe is right, is right according to act utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism gives too much freedom No one really knows whether or not their action is going to be morally right or wrong because no one can look into the future No one knows whether an action will be beneficial to others What someone thinks is right may not be right for another individual and so we are unable to know whether our actions are morally right or wrong.
no
make (someone) legally or morally bound to an action or course of action .
Three main subdivisions of consequentialism are Ethical Egoism- morally right only if the consequences of an action is favorable only to the one performing an action. Utilitarianism- morally right if the consequences of an action is favorable to everyone. Ethical Altruism- morally right if the consequences of an action is favorable to everyone except to the one performing an action.
Nituing
Yes the affirmative action is morally defensive because it gives the minority and disadvantaged people in a given society to take part in nation building.
Morally right action does always maximizes the interests of others. This is a one self interest.