Think about it this way. Positive ontology yields facts. Facts that are quantifiable: thus, your department's stats courses. It is closely aligned with the assumption that there is an objective reality "out there" that we can observe, represent, and make corresponding truth claims about. It really goes back to Descartes' (who was also a mathematician) subject-object dualism.
Interpretive ontology is less concerned with facts as facts. It is more concerned with the way that facts are interpreted. This is because every fact is also in some sense meaningless: it can be understood in different ways, depending on who's interpreting it. For instance, the population of Canada is a fact. But so what? What one does with this information is more important to interpretive ontologists. Interpretive ontologists do not assume that truth or objectivity is easy to establish; in fact, that all truth is more like a consensus than an objective fact. So, even the methods that yield the fact of Canada's population can be called into question. Are refugees counted in this population census? If so, which ones? If not, why not? Who's doing the quantifying and according to what interests?
Even if an interpretive ontologist takes as a working premise that the population of Canada is such and such, their position should not be understood to be an admission that this is an objective fact, or contesting that there are not others who believe it to be an objective fact. They are more concerned by what is done with such facts as these and for what purposes. Qualitative approaches, which are based on interpretive ontology, seek to come to a more coherent understanding of any such facts, by placing them in an experiential and human context, as opposed to letting them just float around to be used for whatever reason. And of course, this is where interpretive ontologists become more critical than positive ontologists would allow.
Durkheim would be something of a positive ontologist, because he did not always recognize that his theory was only a theory--a model based on apparent 'facts'.
While Weber would be more of an interpretive ontologist because he believed that his theories were only "ideal models." When they didn't fit 'reality,' this was because the model was only an ideal and theoretical construction.
Structural differences: relate to differences in social positions, roles, and hierarchies within a society. Cultural differences: refer to variations in beliefs, values, norms, and practices among different social groups. Interactional differences: involve variations in communication patterns, styles, and interpersonal interactions between individuals.
The retardation ratio is not a valid or appropriate term to use when discussing differences between males and females. It is important to use respectful and accurate language when addressing gender differences.
practitioners of interpretivism and positivism. Interpretivists emphasize understanding cultures through subjective meanings and symbolic interpretations, while positivists focus on empirical observation, measurement, and quantifiable data to study cultures. These two approaches often clash over the best methods for conducting research and analyzing cultural phenomena.
The rivalry between the greasers and the socs in the 1950s was fueled by socioeconomic differences, with the greasers coming from working-class backgrounds and the socs being more affluent. Differences in appearance, behavior, and social status further deepened the conflict between the two groups depicted in S. E. Hinton's novel "The Outsiders."
That is 100% false. Any differences between minority groups and majority groups in a society have far more to do with environmental factors (schooling, work opportunities, class and culture distinctions) than with heredity.All humans are 99.99% the same at the genetic level; to our DNA, variations in skin color and eyelid shape are as meaningless as eye color and nose shape. However, throughout history (from the Mongol hordes to Portuguese slave raids to Nazi pogroms) these visible differences have been used to justify the supposed superiority of the majority at the expense of the minority group.
ontology is what you can know epistemology is how you can know it
Ontology is a metaphysical look at our being. Epistemology tries to expose the difference between opinions and proven thoughts. The use of epistemology helps to determine conclusions from ontology.
Positive and negative messages have different perceptions between different individuals. What one person thinks is negative another person may not.
Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that explores the nature of reality and existence, while ontology specifically focuses on the study of being and the nature of existence. In simpler terms, metaphysics deals with the fundamental nature of reality, while ontology examines the nature of being and existence.
Ontology is the study of being and existence, focusing on the nature of reality and what exists. Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that explores the fundamental nature of reality, including concepts like existence, causality, and identity. In essence, ontology is a subset of metaphysics that specifically deals with the nature of being.
The study of metaphysics inscapes ontology. Modernism begins to transpose ontology towards the orchestration of the world around us, whereas metaphysics deals with the relational world, in terms of objective supposition. Subjectivity remains a placement theory that converses in the language of conditional association. Metaphysics is not subjective to the world, but to one's own practical experience of perception that cannot be theorized without exception.
PNP means positive negative positive and viceversa. while both can be used on a circuit its polarity application must be followed.
A positron is the antimatter counterpart of an electron, with a positive charge, while a proton is a subatomic particle found in the nucleus of an atom, with a positive charge.
the right way to right somthing the right way to right somthing
Very roughly, an "ontology" is an account about the way we give accounts; a formal description of the formal objects and structures of thought. So a "political ontology" would relate our accounts of the relations between people, policy and power. One way of thinking about this might involve asking after what the social "really" consists in. Is it a matter of a cause, an idea -- or a revolutionary "act"?
Every science has its own ontology, epistemology and consequently its own methodologies. Ontology defines the fundamental categories of reality. Domain ontology as distinct from formal ontology is related to focus of study. Each research field has its own ontology. A biologist, who studies ants, differentiates the ants' specific constituent parts, actions and contexts. Similarly a sociologist will have implicit and/or explicit presuppositions about categories of reality that are fundamental and related in the human and social systems she/he studies. Where formal ontology inquiry is to say something general about reality, domain ontology says something specific about different areas of reality. Epistemology defines how we can know and reason that reality. As for domain ontology, each research field has its own epistemology: The maps applied by the biologist studying ants, are traditionally different from the maps applied by the sociologist in her/his studies of interacting humans. The methodologies of each of these two scientists have followed as different systems of investigative techniques within their focus of study. The biologist and the sociologist traditionally apply different procedures for accomplishing and approaching the phenomena they focus on. They use different scientific methods studying different domains with different epistemology and ontology.
An ontology is a formal system used to define concepts and the relationships between them in a specific domain. It helps structure information in a way that is understandable for machines and enables more effective data integration and knowledge sharing. Ontologies are commonly used in fields such as artificial intelligence, information science, and philosophy.