Pro's:
* There are loads and loads of shops and shopping stores, which means there are is a differing array of areas where you are able to go in order to buy stuff which you want or need. This is brilliant because, instead of needing to go a long way in order to get stuff, you are able to go only a small way. * Restaurants, although quite expensive, are nice establishments to go to in order to eat out, or basically just enjoy yourself. * Museums are interesting, and if there are students who wish to learn more about the time periods they are studying, then museums are ideal for them to do so as well as enjoying themselves at the same time. * Concerts are attended by loads and loads of persons, and will probably be there for persons who wanna see their favorite musical artists live, and to enjoy the music too. * Sporting events are an interest for many persons who enjoy the adrenaline rush of either participating or watching their team try their hardest to win or compete against the other teams. * Zoo's are nice areas to go to because they offer large amounts of animals which otherwise would be dangerous and practically impossible to see in reality. The only other way to see animals any other way is by safariing, which is a tad dangerous, or on television, which sometimes can be tedious and harmful to the eye.
Con's:
* Traffic is a bad thing is practically all city areas because there are so many motorists attempting to get to other areas in the city at sometimes all times in the day. This can be dangerous because of motorway accidents and also that persons will be late for occasions they wanna go to. * Crime is atrociously alive in city areas because criminals realise that there are loads of persons to steal from, hurt or do whatever else they do, whereas out of the city, there are normally very few persons and less important stuff to steal. * Higher costs overall; because of inflation in city areas, costs are shooting up at incredibly untrackable rates. So although frequent shopping centres is a good thing, the costs bring it to the downside. * Rent is bad, what with inflation at the rates at it is. Unfortunately, inflation for homes is gradually seeping into out-of-city areas, sometimes quite speedily. * Food costs are going up because of inflation. * Gas is going up in costs as well, because of inflation. === === === === Pros:
* City-dwellers in more built-up areas (eg, Manhattan, as opposed to outer Brooklyn) are less involved in their neighbors lives, allowing for more privacy without the total isolation of rural areas. * Greater infrastructure, such as a public (safety-tested) water supply, mass transit systems and nearby high-quality emergency services. * Higher levels of tolerance/acceptance for others who are of different ethnicities, religions, lifestyles, or general habits. There is a place for everyone. * There is a greater array of job opportunities, so more specialized professions may be more doable in a city Cons:
* Port cities have higher than average populations of Norway rats, even compared to other densely populated areas. * Reputation for high crime, though the reality, once adjusted per capita, is very different. * With immigrants (both from the outlying suburbs and rural areas, and from other countries) there is high competition for entry-level and menial jobs. * City-dwellers are less involved in their neighbors lives. (pro/con status depends whether you appreciate that sort of thing.)
To start an argumentative essay on the advantages and disadvantages of living in a town, introduce the topic by providing a brief overview of town living. You can mention key benefits like access to services, job opportunities, and community amenities as advantages, while highlighting potential drawbacks such as traffic congestion, noise pollution, and higher costs of living. Conclude your introduction with a clear thesis statement that outlines your perspective on the topic.
Pros: Access to a wide variety of amenities such as cultural events, entertainment, and diverse dining options. Opportunities for employment, networking, and social interactions due to high population density. Cons: High cost of living, congestion, pollution, and noise. Increased competition for resources and potential for isolation and detachment from nature.
Pros of fascism: centralized authority can lead to efficient decision-making and implementation of policies, promoting national unity and stability. However, cons include suppression of individual freedoms, lack of political diversity, and the potential for authoritarianism to lead to abuse of power and human rights violations.
Pros: Ensures that the candidate with the most votes across the entire country wins the election, potentially reducing disparities between the popular vote and electoral college outcome. Cons: Could lead to campaigns focusing only on large population centers and neglecting smaller states, potentially disenfranchising voters in less populous areas.
Pros of earlier settlement houses included providing social services, education, and support to immigrant communities. They also helped bridge the gap between different social classes. However, cons included reinforcing paternalistic attitudes and perpetuating cultural assimilation at the expense of preserving immigrants' cultural identities.
Pros: Its quiet and your alone Cons: Your in Massachusetts
Cons: earthsquakes
fdsaf
Seriously? There are no "pros." The obvious "cons" are one: you're no longer living!
not many for a pro
The pros and cons of a Songy Digital Camcorder include the basic pros and cons of any digital camcorders. Some of the pros are the compact design and the ability to connect to a computer or a television for large-screen viewing. Some of the cons are the price and the battery life.
Pros:Freedom, become more responsible Cons: No one to talk to, loneliness
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros: trade fresh water transportation good soil for farming Cons: flooding carrying disease
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros are + and cons are-
pros: goodness cons: badness