ricky mum oh yhyhyhyhyhyh!!!!!!
Yes, nuclear power stations are generally more efficient than coal power stations, as they can generate more electricity with the same amount of fuel. Nuclear power produces less waste and greenhouse gas emissions compared to coal power.
Coal fired plants about 40 percent, nuclear reactors (PWR) about 33 percent
it is not advisable because the coal will finish more faster and once the coal is finished the power stations will go to waste
It is efficient at 35% (When created in power stations)
Nuclear generating stations are generally more efficient than coal/oil burning stations in terms of energy production per unit of fuel consumed. This is because nuclear reactions are much more energy-dense and produce more power with less fuel. Additionally, nuclear plants have lower operating costs and emit less greenhouse gases compared to coal/oil plants.
We should carry on using coal power stations because we can make them eco-friendly.
Because the get their coal by rail.
Coal is used all over the US in power stations to generate electricity.
coal and petrolcan be saved by efficient usage of them .
coal
the thermal power stations are not only located in India, they are located in the part of the world where there are coal reserves, India has large coal reserve located in various parts of M.P,C.G,JHARKHAND & KOLKATA,this is the reason behind the location of thermal power stations in India,as these stations use coal for the generation of electricity
Coal power stations use coal as their primary resource to generate electricity. They also use water for steam production, cooling, and emissions control. Additionally, they require land for infrastructure and waste disposal.