Cesar Chavez

to stop the suffering of the Hispanics and get better working conditions for them on the farms.

Cesar Chavez, the prominent labor leader and civil rights activist, earned a modest income during his lifetime, often working for very low wages as he advocated for the rights of farmworkers. While specific figures for his earnings are not widely documented, it's known that he lived simply and dedicated his life to the movement rather than personal wealth. His focus was on improving conditions for workers rather than accumulating financial success.

Cesar Chavez faced many obstacles or problems. Some of them include not being able to finish school and having to go work a farm to help support his family. He also had to go through loosing his family farm during the great depression. He also faced the struggle when he was starting up his organization to help the farm workers. He faced many challenges there trying to help them. He even fasted for about 34 days to help his own cause. After all those obstacles he still made it through .

Cesar Chavez School is located in various cities across the United States, as multiple schools are named after the civil rights activist. One notable example is the Cesar Chavez Academy in Detroit, Michigan, which serves grades K-12. Another is the Cesar Chavez Elementary School in San Francisco, California. To find a specific Cesar Chavez school, it's best to include the city or state in your inquiry.

he was a good man and helped others

Cesar Chavez helped the farm workers because as a young boy his dad was in an accident so he had to drop out of school so that his mom wouldn't have to work in the field, so he worked so she wouldn't have to. He saw first hand what the farm workers had to endure and wanted to help them as much as himself and his family

If César Chávez hadn't organized the United Farm Workers (UFW) movement, farm labor conditions in the United States might have remained stagnant for much longer. His absence would likely mean a delay in achieving better wages, working conditions, and labor rights for agricultural workers. The lack of a strong grassroots movement could have resulted in continued exploitation and marginalization of farm laborers. Overall, the significant advances made in labor rights during the 1960s and 1970s might not have occurred as swiftly or effectively.