Fuel Cells

You use it to upgrade the flamethrower, which you have to make from a leaf blower, which you get from the hardware store, which is restricted to the Director's Cut.

Probably, but the technology for ordinary day usage just isn't there yet.

Nuclear power can be safe. We just need to think of all the possible scenario's that could happen. The Japanese built the nuclear plant to sustain an earthquake much larger (and it did), but they didn't see the fact that the tsunami flooded the generator rooms and rendered the generators useless. Had they made the generator structure so ocean water could not penetrate or move the structure, they would have been fine.

jaison

the amount of mass that disappears in the fusion of two hydrogen atoms is morte than the amount of mass that dissappears when two atoms are fully used in a cell

Water vapor is the sole byproduct of fuel cell electric vehicles.

green water

A hydrogen vehicle is an alternative fuel vehicle that uses hydrogen as its onboard fuel for motive power. The term may refer to a personal transportation vehicle, such as an automobile, or any other vehicle that uses hydrogen in a similar fashion, such as an aircraft. The power plants of such vehicles convert the chemical energy of hydrogen to mechanical energy either by burning hydrogen in an internal combustion engine, or by reacting hydrogen with oxygen in a fuel cell to run electric motors. Widespread use of hydrogen for fueling transportation is a key element of a proposed hydrogen economy.

yes it type of fuel

explain how fuel cells are commonly categorized

The most likely spot for a hydrogen fuel tank on any possible car that will be built is going to be on the top of the car. This would prevent you from becoming part of the fuel burn in an accident. The fuel would flow up and away from the people involved.

They would not be any more dangerous because of the fuel they were carrying. The technology may still be unlikely to go into this direction because they provide no real advantage at the moment over gas or diesel powered cars. Hydrogen would not provide any real savings in terms of fossil fuel reduction or savings from a pollution standpoint.

The current method of making hydrogen is to strip it from natural gas.

no, they just mean that the engine has a supply of hydrogen to run on rather than any other fuel

there's only pros

Neither car is available and most likely will not be for some time, if ever. Fuel cell technology is probably closer to a reality. The major disadvantage is that they produce no fuel savings and are not a positive for our environment. Hydrogen is derived by stripping it from natural gas. The net result is that we use fossil fuel to power the fuel cell car.

The most important advantage of fuel cells is that their only byproduct is water, and of course discarded parts. The disadvantage is that the hydrogen used in them has to be electrolyzed from water or found in some other way. Because of the law of conservation of energy, fuel cells do not produce energy, they only store it.

Anything that needs electricity can be fed from a fuel cell.
Power vehicles

fuel cells converts chemical energy to eletrical power and the only waste product for fuel cells is water

The main problem is that the hydrogen gas is difficult to store. Since it would have to highly pressurised, it would be inconvenient and dangerous to store in cars/automobiles.