Hunter-Gatherers

they followed the animals as they migrated so did the nomads

They are Neolithic meaning they don't stay in one spot because they are constantly walking around in search of food. They are always going from place to place that they don't have time to make a stable livable place.

Gobekli Tepe was likely constructed by a semi-nomadic or semi-sedentary society of hunter-gatherers. While they may not have been fully settled, these early groups had the necessary social organization, labor force, and technological capabilities to build impressive structures. The existence of Gobekli Tepe challenges traditional assumptions about the development of complex societies, indicating that the construction of monumental architecture predates the emergence of fully settled, organized civilizations.

The Bantu-speaking people had agricultural skills, which allowed them to cultivate crops and settle in one place. This gave them a more stable source of food and led to the development of complex societies, while hunter-gatherers relied on hunting and gathering for their sustenance.

their small population size and nomadic lifestyle. With fewer people, there was less demand for resources and smaller impact on the environment. Additionally, their mobility allowed them to move to different areas as resources became scarce, minimizing overexploitation of local ecosystems.

they use things like animal skins maybe leaves

berrys, animals, leafs, and deers

Early man killed animals by persistence hunting. In this method of hunting, a group of humans would use their superior endurance to run down their prey over a distance of 10-20 kilometres. By the end of the chase the animal was exhausted and was finished off at close range with a spear or knife.

Trees, grains, wheat, corn, and stuff(:

People did not hunt dinosaurs because there were no people in the time of the dinosaurs.

dgssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssc

A hunter-gatherer is someone who lives by hunting animals and gathering wild plants to eat and use for t9oher purposes.

A food producer is a farmer or herder who depends for food primarily on the domesticated plants and animals he raises.

A hunter-gatherer community is a (to put it simply) is a bunch of people, usually in ancient history that live off the food that they had to gather from the forest, rain or other wise and kill themselves. In most hunter-gatherer communities the woman would gather fruits and things to traid and the men would hunt for meat. These hunter gatherer comunities traded things like fruit and animal skins, or even beads for clothing anf food.

They used different kinds of weapons such as knives, spears, etc.

If they absolutely, could not find any food, anywhere, they starved to death.

Wheat is not a naturally occurring crop. It is the result of generations of cultivating and breeding by farmers starting with a wild grass and choosing the best seeds each cycle.

Hunter gatherers could exist in the same areas as farmers and could snack on the farmer's wheat crops. However before farmers, no wheat. So when everybody was a hunter gatherer nobody had wheat.

There are many answers to this and too little proof of any one viewpoint. One theory is that humans learned to make fire and cook approximately 1.5 million years ago. This advancement was part of a great leap in human ability to eat more kinds of food, preserve food, digest more quickly, etc. Other theorists put the date for humans to make fire much, much later, perhaps only about 100,000 years ago. Again, the "how" part of the question has no firm answer.

Hunter-gatherers would use, for hunting, arrows, spears, knifes and their own strength to catch and kill their food. And why do you need to go online to find out this question? if your in school you should have textbooks to answer your questions! pathetic!

I am pretty sure that roots, berries and tree barks are most commonly used to make the dyes for face painting. These natural raw materials are ground and made to a paste to make the dye. Clay of different hues is also used in Native

Jared Diamond challenges the idea that the transition from hunter-gatherer societies to farming was a straightforward progression leading to a more advanced civilization. He highlights the negative consequences of agriculture, such as increased social inequality, disease, and environmental degradation, suggesting that the transition was not uniformly positive for all societies. Diamond argues that some hunter-gatherer societies may have been better off before adopting agriculture.

One important difference is that hunter-gatherer societies relied on foraging and hunting for food, while agricultural societies cultivated crops and raised animals for sustenance. This shift from nomadic lifestyles to settled communities allowed for the development of more complex social structures and technologies.

This statement is generally not accurate. Industrial societies typically have a larger environmental impact due to their high levels of resource consumption and pollution. Nomadic societies often have sustainable practices that allow them to live in harmony with the environment, such as moving to new areas when resources are depleted.

The abundance of natural resources, such as salmon, berries, and game animals, made the Pacific Northwest a fertile region for hunter-gatherer societies. The temperate climate and diverse ecosystems provided a reliable food source year-round. Additionally, the dense forests and rugged terrain made agriculture challenging, leading many indigenous groups to continue their hunting and gathering way of life.

In some hunter-gatherer societies, there might be slight distinctions based on age, skill, or experience, but overall, most members tend to have relatively equal standing within the group. Social cohesion is often maintained through shared resources and strong reciprocal relationships among community members.