0
Irrational Numbers
An irrational number is a number that can't be expressed by a fraction having integers in both its numerator and denominator. While their existence was once kept secret from the public for philosophical reasons, they are now well accepted, yet still surprisingly hard to prove on an individual basis. Please post all questions about irrational numbers, including the famous examples of π, e, and √2, into this category.
3,962 Questions
Is the sum of e and Pi irrational or rational?
According to several sources such as Wikipedia and Wolfram Alpha, this is an open question. In fact, there is no pair of non-zero integers m and n for which it is known whether mπ + ne is irrational or not.
Who proved that pi was irrational and when?
In 1761, Joseph Lambert proved that pi was irrational by basically proving that the tangent of some number x could be expressed as a particular continued fraction as a function of x. He then went on to show that if x was rational, the continued fraction must be irrational, and since the tangent of pi/4 was 1 (i.e. rational), then pi/4 and thus pi itself must not be rational.
What two irrational numbers make a rational number?
The simplest example (of infinitely many) is probably the squareroot of two multiplied by itself equals two.
Take any rational number, say 4.177 and divide it with any irrational number, say the square root of 13, and you will get a new irrational number. The product of your two irrational numbers now make a rational number.
No because 400 is a rational number that can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 400/1
Is 88 a rational or an irrational number?
88 is a rational number, since it can be represented in the form p/q = 88.
Are integers irrational numbers?
No- integers are a kind of rational number and are not irrational.
One well-known example of an irrational number is the square root of 2.
What describes an irrational number?
The basic definition is that a rational number can be expressed as a fraction, with integers in the numerator and the denominator; if such a representation is not possible, you have an irrational number. For example, 1/3, 5/2 and 7 (which is equal to 7/1) are rational numbers; the square root of 2, pi, and e are irrational, because it has been proven that none of them can be expressed as a fraction with integers.
Is -13.5 an irrational number?
yes because two rational numbers divide to get that number. Wich are for example 27/-2, therefore -13.5 is rational.
Is 0.153 an irrational number?
No it is not. It can be written as a fraction, so it cannot be irrational.
What is the difference between irrational numbers and integers?
An irrational number cannot be expressed as a ratio in the form p/q where p and q are integers and q > 0. Integers can be.
Why all irrational numbers are not surd?
There are transcendental numbers such as pi, e, phi. The fact that they are transcendental means that they are not solutions of non-trivial algebraic polynomials with rational coefficients. There is, therefore, no surd form for such numbers.
Such numbers cannot be ordered in the manner suggested by the question because:
For every whole number there are integers, rational numbers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger.
For every integer there are whole numbers, rational numbers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger.
For every rational number there are whole numbers, integers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger.
For every natural number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger.
For every irrational number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, natural numbers and real numbers that are bigger.
For every real number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, natural numbers and irrational numbers that are bigger.
Each of these kinds of numbers form an infinite sets but the size of the sets is not the same. Georg Cantor showed that the cardinality of whole numbers, integers, rational numbers and natural number is the same order of infinity: aleph-null.
The cardinality of irrational numbers and real number is a bigger order of infinity: aleph-one.
Would the domain be something other than all real numbers provide an example?
It could be a subset: for example, for the function y = log(x), the domain is x > 0.
There are many functions whose domain is the complex plane.
Is the square root of negative 127 an irrational or rational number?
Neither.
(It is a complex number.)
How do you graph two integers the irrational number would fall between?
The answer will depend on the form in which the irrational number is given.
For example, we know that pi is approx 3.14159 and so it falls between 3 and 4.
Can you make an operator that takes any given irrational number and maps it onto the rationals?
Of course not.
Number if irrational numbers is larger than number of rational numbers.
To be more exact: There is no one-to-one mapping of set of rational numbers
to the set of irrational numbers. If there would be such a mapping, their cardinality
(see Cardinality ) would be same.
In reality, rational numbers are countable (cardinality alef0)
real numbers, as well as irrational numbers are not countable (cardinality alef1).
These are topics in
wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfinite_number
theory
Is 3.5 irrational or rational?
No. An irrational number is one that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers. 3.5 = 7/2, and so is rational.
Why cant irrational numbers be represented in decimal form?
But irrational numbers are decimals that can't be expressed as fractions
Irrational numbers can not be written in form?
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as the division of two integers where the divisor is not zero. Irrational numbers are numbers that are not rational.
Irrational numbers, therefore, are numbers that can notbe written as the division of two integers where the divisor is not zero.
