i just know 2 of them..
1. XRA A
2. SUB A
[1] the accumulator is meant to be an operand. so there is no requirement for the operand address field for one operand in the instruction. this results in short of CPU supports zero address instructions. Normally CPUs have two types of instructions:1)zero address2)single addressthe single address instruction have one operand in main memory and the other in accumulator.[2] instruction cycle takes less time. it saves time in instruction fetching due to the absence of operand fetching due to the absence of operand fetch.
An accumulator machine, also called a single accumulator organisation , or a CPU with accumulator-based architecture, is a kind of CPU where, although it may have several registers, the CPU mostly stores the results of calculations in one special register, typically called "the accumulator". Historically almost all early computers were accumulator machines; and many microcontrollers still popular as of 2010
It depends on whether the machine code is one, two, or three bytes long, and on whether or not the instruction transferred control to another location. In the case of a non-jump single byte instruction, the PC will have a value of 2060H after the instruction is complete, and it will be 2061H or 2062H after a two or three byte instruction. In the case of a jump, call, or interrupt, the PC will depend on the instruction.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
input
Flynn's taxonomy is used to categorize computer architectures. Considers the number of processors and the number of data paths incorporated into an architecture. The fours combinations of processors and data path are: SISD( Single instruction, single data stream) MISD( Multiple instructions, single data stream) SIMD (Single instructions, multiple data streams) MIMD( Multiple instructions, multiple data streams)
The betting term 'accumulator' refers to a single bet consisting of at least four selections, but possibly more than four. The most important difference that differentiates the Accumulator Bet from other bet types is that all selections must be correct for the bet to be paid out. In the world of sports betting, accumulator betting is the most sought after betting practice among bookmakers these days. If you are new to online sports betting, then accumulator bets might seem a bit off-putting to you. For the purposes of your knowledge, an accumulator bet is a single bet consisting of multiple bets and a winning accumulator bet is dependent on all linked bets. The total winnings of the Accumulator Bet are multiplied by all odds and the total amount placed at stake. Accumulator bets or parlays are often used at football, horse racing and tennis betting events. 1xbet is one of the most famous betting sites that offers you some of the best sporting odds you will find. This is a fast and reliable betting company that helps you maximize your winnings. Also, fully licensed betting company. Best betting company for accumulator bet, praised by all over work Bettor.
(Single instruction, Multiple Data) A process that allows the CPU to execute a single instruction simultaneously on multiple peices of data, rather than by repetitive looping.
8 Bits