Apple can be considered a monopolistic competitor in certain markets, particularly in the smartphone and personal computer sectors. While it holds significant market power due to brand loyalty, innovation, and a unique ecosystem, it still faces competition from other firms like Samsung, Microsoft, and Google. This competition leads to differentiation in products, allowing Apple to maintain some pricing power while not being a pure monopoly. Overall, Apple exists in a market characterized by many competitors offering similar but differentiated products.
yes
Monopoly means that there are no competitor for your product or servises
one firm which sells a good price set by that firm hard for other firms to enter market
YES
Consumers will substitute with a rival's product.
I think the market structure of the apple is oligopoly because the firm like apple creating the ipod and iphone is some what few not exceed to 10 also. so, the firm apple applies to oligopoly market structure.
it is not a monopoly firm
The monopoly surplus graph shows that a monopolistic firm has market power, meaning it can set prices higher than in a competitive market. This leads to economic inefficiency because the firm produces less and charges higher prices, resulting in a deadweight loss for society.
The competitive dimension of a monopolistic firm lies in its ability to differentiate its products from those of competitors, which allows it to exert market power and influence prices. Unlike pure monopolies, monopolistic firms operate in markets with many competitors but offer unique products, leading to brand loyalty and reduced price sensitivity among consumers. This differentiation enables them to maintain a degree of control over pricing and output, even as they face competition from similar products. Ultimately, their competitive strategy focuses on innovation, marketing, and customer experience to enhance their market position.
He founded Apple, the computer and technology firm, and was its CEO until his death in 2011.
Perfectly competitive, because both firms will compete to earn a greater market share (they are "price takers"), leading to prices that more closely resemble a perfectly competitive market than a monopolistic market (one dominant "price making" firm).
In the long run, if a firm is making a profit more firms will enter. This will cause profit to drop. Firms will eventually drop out because of this and economic profit will makes it way to zero(a result of the invisible hand).