No. They are two entirely separate corporations. In terms of market capitalization, Apple is bigger than IBM.
IBM came first
All three companies produce computers that are compatible with many products created by IBM.
i thin it might be IBM because apple have their own way of Surfing the web and stuff
Windows works with IBM machines, though Windows '98 is incredibly obsolete at this time.
Technically, the only computers that can be called "IBM Computers" are the ones that have been manufactured and/or sold by IBM. However, the "IBM Compatible Computers" are those that have been built in accordance with the IBM Standard. IBM created the original PC then turned it over to the "open architecture" community to be built by anyone who wants to follow those standards. IBM Compatible computers are the "PC" including the Laptop PC. Pretty much just about anything that's not "Apple".
IBM no longer produces hardware that is compatible with Windows '98 but it will run on a recent Apple computer within the Virtual Box software. (See links below)
They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.They were more involved in software, not creating computers. So their main impact is on how we use the computers, what programs we find on them and what operating systems are on them, not the actual creation of the types of computers we have today. IBM, Apple and other companies were more responsible for that.
There is no such difference. All digital computers have elements that basically work with two different states; these are commonly called 1s and 0s, sometimes "true"and "false". But there is no difference in this sense between IBM and Apple.
IBM (International Business Machines) set the standard for personal computers with their IBM PC, which was introduced in 1981. The IBM PC set the standard for hardware architecture and software compatibility, and was widely adopted by other manufacturers. Today, personal computers still follow the basic design principles established by IBM.
Be more specific of the two types you want!
The PowerPC family of CPU chips was a RISC type processor created together by IBM, Motorola and Apple. They were most popular in the Macintosh computers before Apple started using Intel based processors.
IBM contributed the electronic type writer into the growth of computers