not really because it can get constantly changed by people worldwide which might not be factual information
some of the info on wikipedia isn't true but some is so it may not be the most accurate source to rely on.
For these reasons:Never rely on just ONE source for informationDon't rely on something that you don't know who wrote it(look at what your reading right now)Wikipedia even says "we don't expect you to trust usAccurate contributors can be bannedThere isn't as many contributors as before on Wikipedia.
For these reasons:Never rely on just ONE source for informationDon't rely on something that you don't know who wrote it(look at what your reading right now)Wikipedia even says "we don't expect you to trust usAccurate contributors can be bannedThere isn't as many contributors as before on Wikipedia.
Some insects that rely on binocular vision include the Praying Mantis and the Dragonflies. You can learn more about these insects online at the Wikipedia.
For these reasons:Don't rely on just ONE when doing researchDon't rely on something that you don't know who wrote it(look at what your reading right now)Wikipedia even says "we don't expect you to trust us".Accurate contributors can be banned.There isn't aren't many contributors on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia has been shown to be a reliable source of information that is constantly up to date and where it is possible to bring corrections to articles where needed. I think you can rely on the information there.
For these reasons:Don't rely on something that you don't know who wrote it(look at what your reading right now)Wikipedia even says "we don't expect you to trust us".Accurate contributors can be banned.There isn't aren't many contributors on Wikipedia.
Know one knows but dont rely on Wikipedia that much... andone could make up bogus stuff
he doesn't really have a question, but did all this to prove to Courage Matiza from Zimbabwe that answers.com/wikianswers is much like wikipedia. Get it now courage?....if you want to, you can still rely on this, but i wudnt.
The Simple English Wikipedia is not specifically for children, but it puts articles in a simpler context, which may make it easier for a child to understand. Simple Wikipedia can still contain articles on adult subject matter, such as sexuality, so use at your own discretion.
It is a good idea to use these for research. However, you shouldn't rely on either as the be-all-and-end-all of information, without searching other sites and maybe even cracking a book or two.I think the reason someone may have told you it was a bad idea is that on either site, you may encounter opinion, rather than fact. I think, however, it would be better to say that you should not rely on any one source of information while conducting research. You should always seek corroborating information, no matter if you use books, websites, or whatever, before reaching a decision as to what is accurate.It is not good because, people post things on that website that may not be true, like this website. Everything people post may not be true.
Wikipedia citations are typically in the format of author, title of the article, website name, publication date, and URL. To properly structure them for academic research, include the author's name (if available), the title of the article, the date it was last updated, the name of the website, and the URL. Additionally, it is important to verify the information from other reliable sources and not solely rely on Wikipedia for academic research.