0
For these reasons:
- Never rely on just ONE source for information
- Don't rely on something that you don't know who wrote it(look at what your reading right now)
- Wikipedia even says "we don't expect you to trust us
- Accurate contributors can be banned
- There isn't as many contributors as before on Wikipedia.
What else can I help you with?
Is this a reliable resource for an academic paper?
hell no. If i saw this site as reference in an academic paper i would no be happy it's like using straight wikipedia. you can't even verify who is writing it.
Is Wikipedia consider a realiable resource for an academic speech?
No
Is britanica online more reliable than Wikipedia?
Britannica Online is generally considered more reliable than Wikipedia due to its editorial process, which involves expert contributors and fact-checking. Wikipedia, while a valuable resource, allows for user-generated content that can vary in accuracy and reliability. Both platforms have their strengths, but for academic or research purposes, Britannica is often preferred for its vetted information. However, Wikipedia can still be useful for quick reference or general knowledge.
Is wikipedia a valid resource?
I find that Wikipedia is a very good source for information although I stillcheckand verify other sources but over all I find it very reliable!
Is it okay to cite Wikipedia in academic papers and research projects?
It is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia in academic papers and research projects because it is a crowdsourced platform that may not always provide accurate or reliable information. It is better to use scholarly sources that have been peer-reviewed for academic credibility.
Is it okay to cite Wikipedia in academic papers or research projects?
It is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia in academic papers or research projects because it is not considered a reliable or authoritative source. It is better to use scholarly sources that have been peer-reviewed for accuracy and credibility.
What format are Wikipedia citations in and how can they be properly structured for academic research?
Wikipedia citations are typically in the format of author, title of the article, website name, publication date, and URL. To properly structure them for academic research, include the author's name (if available), the title of the article, the date it was last updated, the name of the website, and the URL. Additionally, it is important to verify the information from other reliable sources and not solely rely on Wikipedia for academic research.
Is the information regarding the movie 'Oblivion' on wiki reliable and accurate?
The majority of the information on Wikipedia is considered reliable as well as accurate, although in the academic world a citation from a Wikipedia page is not valid. Each Wikipedia page requires citations and the sources, found on the bottom of the page, are the best indicators of the reliability. Looking at the page for Oblivion, the majority of the sources come from the production company, so it is probably pretty accurate AND reliable.
What is an earthquake in Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is an online resource and does not have earthquakes.
How reliable is the Wikipedia?
its a good place to research but its not always reliable.
What is a sentence for the word resource?
Trees are a reliable and vital resource to our community.
How do I register for academic jobs with Wiki?
One does not register for academic jobs with Wiki. Wiki is short for Wikipedia the public online encyclopedia. There are no jobs to offer from Wikipedia.
