No
hell no. If i saw this site as reference in an academic paper i would no be happy it's like using straight wikipedia. you can't even verify who is writing it.
Wikipedia is an online resource and does not have earthquakes.
For these reasons:Never rely on just ONE source for informationDon't rely on something that you don't know who wrote it(look at what your reading right now)Wikipedia even says "we don't expect you to trust usAccurate contributors can be bannedThere isn't as many contributors as before on Wikipedia.
because it is :D
There is no standard of living in Wikipedia, it is an online research resource.
Uniform Resource Locator (URL)Source: Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Academic Search Elite is a resource for academic research that provides content that is essential for collegiate studies. See the Related Links for a link to their web site.
Britannica Online is generally considered more reliable than Wikipedia due to its editorial process, which involves expert contributors and fact-checking. Wikipedia, while a valuable resource, allows for user-generated content that can vary in accuracy and reliability. Both platforms have their strengths, but for academic or research purposes, Britannica is often preferred for its vetted information. However, Wikipedia can still be useful for quick reference or general knowledge.
perhaps you find a better resource than wikipedia.
67
wikipedia is a great resource site