Wikipedia has tens of hundreds of editors that make sure the information is suitable for inquirers. The editors can read over and change ANY information they feel doesn't fit.
There is no question that the quality of content on Wikipedia is poor, especially when compared to a publication like Britannica. Wikipedia is not exactly "bad" because it usually has reliable information on it, however most schools do not allow students to use Wikipedia in research because anyone is allowed to contribute to Wikipedia, and they could put false information on..
Peridot (the silicate mineral) has 'poor' cleavage.See the related Wikipedia link listed below for more information:
Check that on Wikipedia. Should be easy enough. Good luck!
28% Read wikipedia!
One can find more information about getting a poor credit home equity loan by visiting their local bank and talking to an in regards to the issue. Also, they may visit a realty agency and discuss about the poor credit equity loan.
WaterAid is an international non-profit organization that helps poor communities establish sustainable water supplies. More information about WaterAid can be found on Wikipedia, as well as on WaterAid's official website.
No we are very poor and we suck, NOT! WE KICK WIKIPEDIA'S BUTT DUDE!!!!!
it means that the treadmill (union workhouses) and poor laws (see wikipedia) are still going/have not stopped
Look on wikipedia and youll find it
Timing issue, poor ignition.
"Poor" is really a woosy adjective. If you're willing to express the size of the objective mirror in terms of wavelengths instead of inches or meters or yards, then a radio telescope and an optical telescope with equal diameters have equal resolving powers. The familiar difference in their dimensions is simply the obvious consequence of the difference in the wavelength of the signals they happen to be looking at. The shortest radio waves are something like 2,000 times as long as the longest light waves.
Was diffucult for the poor, but most of the people were wealthy so it was not an issue.