We don't have organic phones .
Why are mechanistic and organic structures suited to different organizational environments?
no
Mechanistic structures are suited for stable environments where efficiency and consistency are important, as they rely on clear hierarchical communication and standardized processes. In contrast, organic structures are suited for dynamic environments where flexibility, innovation, and adaptability are crucial, as they emphasize decentralized decision-making and collaboration. Organizations may benefit from a blend of mechanistic and organic elements depending on the nature of their environment and goals.
They are designed for stable environments while organic structures are better suited for changing and innovative environments.
Douglas c. Neckers has written: 'Mechanistic organic photochemistry'
D C. Necker has written: 'Mechanistic Organic Photochemistry'
Mechanistic Organisation is like a machine, difficult to change. Bureaucratic & stable - (gov policy, technolgy, competition). Organisation seeks loyalty and obedience. Organic Organisation As a culture are living and responsive to change. Consultation & involvement in decisions.
RIM, the makers of Blackberry phones, is a Canadian company.
Mechanistic
An organic organization is characterized by a flexible structure, decentralized decision-making, and a focus on collaboration and adaptability, allowing it to respond quickly to changes in the environment. In contrast, a mechanistic organization features a rigid hierarchy, centralized authority, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities, emphasizing efficiency and control. While organic organizations thrive in dynamic settings, mechanistic organizations are typically more effective in stable environments where routine tasks predominate.
Blackberry is a company from Bangladesh
Definition of mechanistic