Academically speaking, NO. However, sometimes you can scroll to the bottom and see the references there, and you might find a few creditable sources that discuss the topic your researching.
No, it is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
It is generally not acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
source wikipedia
Wikipedia is a tertiary source (which is a document that exists to serve as an index of primary sources). According to Wikipedia, "As tertiary sources, encyclopedias and textbooks attempt to summarize and consolidate the source materials into an overview, but may also present subjective commentary and analysis (which are characteristics of a secondary source)."
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
William Addis of England is credited with creating the first mass-produced toothbrush in 1780.For the source and more detailed information concerning this subject, click on the related links section (Wikipedia) indicated below this answer box.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Genoa. Source Wikipedia
yes they are source wikipedia
Source- wikipedia.
It was publushed in 1820. Source: wikipedia
1955....source wikipedia