Yes it is a wonderful and useful website with full of valuable information which are very useful for the devlopment of humanity and world community
AnswerIt is okay, however on some of the articles it has the "neutrality is debated" or "may contain factual errors" or "no author listed" icons and people still refer to it for a source and treat it like it is the one link to absolute truth. That is one of the negativepoints I see. AnswerYes i love wiki reading through its brilliant articles is one of my fav hobbies! ;Pxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah.
It is mostly good but sometimes people lie about information so it is not ht emost trusty website
One can find information about patent agents online. Wikipedia is a helpful source as it defines and elaborates it. It is also a good source because it lists links and resources to farther expand your knowledge.
no the source is not well updated you should try answers.com and google.com
Wikipedia is considered a reliable source because each article must undergo a rigorous review process, with many professional reviewers involved. Is the ideal place to start your research and get a global picture of a topic. Is always good check the facts we find in Wikipedia against other sources but Wikipedia is as accurate or more accurate than more traditional encyclopedias.
Wikipedia is generally not considered a good source by schools. The reason for this is that anyone can edit it; you have no idea of the credentials of the person creating the content. Although someone posting on the article on parthenogenesis or the Balfour Declaration could be a professor who has written several books on the subject, they could also be a 8 year old who has no real idea. Since the author of the content cannot be checked for their authority, most schools prefer that you do not cite Wikipedia as a source. Even though any facts on Wikipedia must themselves be cited, there can still be issues with this process. Citations can be incorrect or missing, meaning that the information they support may or may not be accurate; you have no way of finding out. Also, Wikipedia is not considered an academic source and is not peer reviewed. This means that, in addition to being unable to determine the authenticity of the source, the content has not undergone a strict process of evaluation by experts in the field. It is therefore not considered an appropriate source for an academic paper or project. That being said, many professors will recommend Wikipedia as a place to start research. It can be a good place to get general ideas for papers, speeches, and projects. The vast majority of information on Wikipedia is correct, but, since it cannot be taken for granted that it is authentic, once you begin to do more in depth research you should switch to better, more academic sources.
A public library.
in the related box below, I posted the wikipedia article on the holocaust. It is a good source. check it out.
Wikipedia is usually a good source. After that, try a library.
It's not a bad site - it can be a good source of information and knowledge.
I am a Professor of Medicine at Harvard University, and my students have been using Wikipedia for years. It is a very credible and good source. Not to mention but that its a great and a reliable source.
I find that Wikipedia is a very good source for information although I stillcheckand verify other sources but over all I find it very reliable!
Knowledge base here is more extensive thanks to questions.
wikipedia is a good source