Well someone can just answer a wrong question mistaking a person such as "Did Edward Manet have any sisters"? Someone can just put 100 sisters. But if you look sometime Wikianswers will give you the right answers because people actually know the answer! Well someone can just answer a wrong question mistaking a person such as "Did Edward Manet have any sisters"? Someone can just put 100 sisters. But if you look sometimes Wikianswers will give you the right answers because people actually know the answer! Well someone can tell you the wrong answer and you could get fooled by it.Though they can tell you the right answers. HE HAS 10000 SISTERS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH YOU ARE GAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There are no bad points. Everything is good about fasting. It helps the person lose weight, seek refuge to Allah, etc;
No, the person should state good and bad points for their job.
better than answers.com
Depends On The Question....
WikiAnswers isn't a bad site. It just has its good contributors and bad
good points include free energy bad points include they take up lots of room
Bad points.
Good points - Zero. Bad points - yet another unjustified intrusion by officialdom into personal privacy and freedom.
good is serve people and bad is to make schams
its smellyy
There is no bad thing about answering a question on WikiAnswers, there are only good things and benefits. Like, for the user that asked the question, now they know the answer that they were longing for. And, you, you just shared your knowledge, doesn't that feel good?
The good points about wood are that its strong but the bad point is that it can get damp or termites can eat it.