One argument in favor of dropping atomic bombs on Japan was the belief that it would lead to a swift end to World War II, potentially saving countless lives. Proponents argued that an invasion of Japan would result in massive casualties for both Allied forces and Japanese civilians, while the bombings would force Japan to surrender unconditionally. Additionally, demonstrating the power of atomic weapons was seen as a way to establish a strong post-war position, particularly in relation to the Soviet Union.
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland Japan
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland Japan
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland Japan.
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland Japan.
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland japan
One key argument used in favor of dropping atomic bombs on Japan was the belief that it would hasten the end of World War II and save lives. Proponents, including some military leaders, argued that a ground invasion of Japan would result in a higher casualty rate for both Allied forces and Japanese civilians. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were seen as a means to compel Japan's unconditional surrender without the need for such an invasion. Additionally, demonstrating the power of the atomic bomb was viewed as a way to establish the United States' dominance in the post-war world.
Because they pissed us off at Pearl Harbor so we returned the favor
It ended the war and collapsed Japan's means to make war so most people favor the use of the atomic bomb in ww2
Which statement reflects an accurate argument in favor of a command economy
More Traditional
Because he leaned towards a view of war being necessary, and the american people just wanted peace and isolationism for the most part.
it would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of mainland Japan.