When your opinion about how to solve a problem differs from your supervisor's, it usually best to follow what the supervisor says to do unless it's dangerous. Telling your supervisor your opinion may help. He may see your initiative and like your suggestion.
An opinion on solving a problem with a supervisor is to sit down and talk to them. Discuss your viewpoint but also listen to and respect theirs.
Modified your opinion
An opinion on solving a problem with a supervisor is to sit down and talk to them. Discuss your viewpoint but also listen to and respect theirs.
An opinion on solving a problem with a supervisor is to sit down and talk to them. Discuss your viewpoint but also listen to and respect theirs.
When my opinion about solving a problem differed from my supervisor, I made sure to respectfully present my perspective, backing it up with data and examples to illustrate my reasoning. I listened to their viewpoint as well, seeking to understand their concerns and priorities. This open dialogue allowed us to explore potential compromises or alternative solutions that combined both of our insights. Ultimately, the experience reinforced the importance of collaboration and communication in problem-solving.
It is to use science for a practical job or to solve a problem.
When you analyze a problem you look it over which is what analyzing means. You look over the problem and then you solve it. When you solve a problem you solve it and you use certain steps and solve it but of course everyone has there ways to solve a problem but some people have ways to solve it by just analysing it. That is the difference.
It didn't solve any problem it was invented as a sport not as a way to solve anything...
no it can not solve the problem
How do you solve the problem of physical memory dump?
how can geography solve the problem of street urchins?
How to solve this problem v427