Stone castles were built because they could not burn down as ealsily as wood castles can.
Using fire to burn it down
eat
Medieval castles were more likely protective but not in a so smart way.The Renaissance was the time that everything changed, things got better than before
the Loire valley and the valley of its subsidiary 'le Cher' are famous for the renaissance castles alongtheir banks.
Square Castles had connected walls which can be burnt from one corner to another. This can happen by digging a tunnel and throwing fire. This feature can affect the whole castle because it can burn down.
Motte and Bailey castles were attacked by arrows. Not just any arrows, arrows that were lit at the ends to burn down the castles.
smoked opium and had swinger parties
yes, motte and bailey castles were very easy to attack as they were made out of wood and could burn very easily. whereas if you were talking about stone keep castles which were pretty much like motte and bailey castles then it would take time to burn as they were made out of stone.
Medieval castles were built for protection and not for comfort. The first castles were built using wood but, were found to burn easily. Stone was then used in replacement of wood.
because peasants tried to burn the wooden houses
the castles in the middle ages were made of stone not wood because wood would burn easily.