0
How might earth climates change if the land area on earth were greater than the area of the world ocean?
If the land area of the earth was greater than the area of the world's ocean, the earth's climate would become much drier because of the reduced source of moisture. The temperature would also increase dramatically.
What else can I help you with?
How might earths climates be different if earths were not tilted on its axis?
Earth's climates might be different because they won't be the same
How might Earth's climate change if the land area on Earth were greater than the area of the world?
If the land area of the earth was greater than the area of the world's ocean, the earth's climate would become much drier because of the reduced source of moisture. The temperature would also increase dramatically.
How might Earths climate change if land area of the Earth were greater than the area of the Earth's oceans?
If the land area of the earth was greater than the area of the world's ocean, the earth's climate would become much drier because of the reduced source of moisture. The temperature would also increase dramatically.
How would your weight change on the surface of an Earth-sized planet whose mass were greater than Earth's?
If the planet were the same size as Earth but its mass were some percent greater than Earth's mass, then your weight there would be that same percent greater than it is on Earth. A bathroom scale on that planet might not read exactly the number that I have described ... your apparent weight, as displayed by a bathroom scale, would also be influenced somewhat by the planet's rate of rotation, which might be something different from 15° per Earth-hour of time.
How might earths climate change if the land area on earth were greater than the area of the world ocean?
If the land area of the earth was greater than the area of the world's ocean, the earth's climate would become much drier because of the reduced source of moisture. The temperature would also increase dramatically.
How might the earth be different if the earths surface absorbed greater or lesser percentages of radiation?
If the Earth's surface absorbed greater percentages of radiation, it could lead to higher global temperatures, potentially exacerbating climate change and altering weather patterns. Conversely, if the surface absorbed lesser percentages, the planet might experience cooler temperatures, which could result in more stable climates but also hinder the growth of ecosystems reliant on adequate warmth. Both scenarios would significantly impact biodiversity, agriculture, and water resources. Overall, the balance of radiation absorption is crucial for maintaining the Earth's climate and supporting life.
How might earth climates be different if earth were not titled on its axis?
There would be no seasons. The weather in any given area would be essentially the same throughout the year.
How might earth's climates be different if earth were not tilted on it's axis?
Earth's climates might be different because they won't be the same
What city has a greater temperature change?
Cities in more temperate climates tend to have larger temperature changes, while cities near the equator or near large bodies of water have more stable temperatures. This means that cities in locations with distinct seasons, such as those in the Midwest of the United States, for example, might experience greater temperature changes throughout the year.
How might Earths climates be different if Earth were not titled on its axis?
There would be no seasons. The weather in any given area would be essentially the same throughout the year.
How might earth's surface change as tectonic plates continue to move?
Wsssdfg fbfbhr
How might the earth be different if the earth's surface adsorbed greater or less percentages of radiation?
If the Earth's surface absorbed greater percentages of radiation, it could lead to higher global temperatures, potentially exacerbating climate change and altering ecosystems. Conversely, if the surface absorbed less radiation, the planet might experience cooler temperatures, which could disrupt weather patterns and reduce the viability of certain habitats. Both scenarios would significantly impact agriculture, water resources, and biodiversity. Overall, the balance of radiation absorption is crucial for maintaining the Earth's climate and supporting life.
