If the Earth's surface absorbed greater percentages of radiation, it could lead to higher global temperatures, potentially exacerbating climate change and altering ecosystems. Conversely, if the surface absorbed less radiation, the planet might experience cooler temperatures, which could disrupt weather patterns and reduce the viability of certain habitats. Both scenarios would significantly impact agriculture, water resources, and biodiversity. Overall, the balance of radiation absorption is crucial for maintaining the Earth's climate and supporting life.
If the Earth's surface absorbed greater percentages of radiation, it could lead to higher global temperatures, potentially exacerbating climate change and altering weather patterns. Conversely, if the surface absorbed lesser percentages, the planet might experience cooler temperatures, which could result in more stable climates but also hinder the growth of ecosystems reliant on adequate warmth. Both scenarios would significantly impact biodiversity, agriculture, and water resources. Overall, the balance of radiation absorption is crucial for maintaining the Earth's climate and supporting life.
Same as percentages less than 100. Percentages greater than 100 will reult in a number that is greater than the original, that's all.
Solar radiation is greater in a particular area due to factors such as proximity to the equator, low levels of atmospheric pollution, clear skies, and minimal cloud cover. Additionally, the angle of the sun's rays and altitude can also contribute to varying levels of solar radiation in different regions.
The ionizing capability of radiation depends on its energy level. Higher energy radiation like gamma rays and X-rays have greater ionizing capabilities compared to lower energy radiation like alpha and beta particles. This is because higher energy radiation can penetrate deeper into material and interact more frequently with atoms, leading to ionization.
Yes, this is true. The longer a person is exposed to radiation and the closer they are to the source of radiation, the greater their risk of harm. The amount of radiation absorbed by the body is directly related to the duration and proximity of exposure.
Ultraviolet radiation has greater energy than infrared radiation. Ultraviolet radiation has shorter wavelengths and higher frequencies, while infrared radiation has longer wavelengths and lower frequencies.
To determine percentages less than 100, multiply the number by x/100. The same holds for percentages over 100 - for example, finding 250 percent of a number is equivalent to multiplying the number by 250/100, that is, 2.5.
Circle graphs are the same as pie charts and data is out in percentages of 360 degrees in sectors of the circle so as the greater the sector then greater is the data
easily liquifiable gases like Cl2, NH3,SO2,HCl are readily adsorbed because the critical temp of these gases are more. so it is easily liquified and adsorbed more readily.[critical temp is the minimum temp above which a gas cannot be liquified]easily liq. gases possess greater vanderwaals forces ,so they are adsorbed readily.these are the 2 reasons why these gases are readily adsorbed than permanent gases like H2, O2.N2 . etc
Yes, 0.9 is greater than 0.05. In decimal form, 0.9 is equivalent to 90% while 0.05 is equivalent to 5%. When comparing percentages, 90% is greater than 5%, making 0.9 greater than 0.05.
Electromagnetic radiation consists of waves with different wavelengths and frequencies. The frequency and energy of electromagnetic radiation are directly proportional—higher frequency waves have higher energy. This relationship is described by the formula E=hf, where E is energy, h is Planck's constant, and f is frequency.
When a nucleus emits radiation, it becomes more stable by releasing excess energy or changing its composition. This emission can result in the formation of a new element or isotope with a different number of protons and neutrons in order to achieve greater stability.