In "Damnation of a Canyon," the author argues against the damming of the Grand Canyon, emphasizing the environmental and cultural consequences of such actions. The piece highlights the intrinsic value of the canyon's natural beauty and ecosystems, as well as the spiritual significance it holds for Indigenous peoples. The author contends that altering this landscape for industrial purposes undermines both ecological integrity and human heritage. Ultimately, the argument champions the preservation of natural wonders over economic gain.
In "The Damnation of Canyon," the author uses ethos by establishing his credibility as a naturalist and environmentalist with extensive knowledge and experience in the field. By presenting himself as a respected authority on the subject of preserving natural landscapes, he gains the trust and respect of his readers, making his arguments more persuasive.
The author of the damnation of a canton is arguing that the canton has committed sins or wrongdoings that deserve punishment or condemnation. They may be highlighting moral failings, injustices, or behavior deemed unacceptable.
getting first hand experince. also using something flashy or a celeb to get you to like it. the author gives facts about the cost of navigating the canyon before and after the dam was built crowded out the glen canyon dam and the creation of lake powell destroyed the area's natural habitat the author offers definitions of words in order to clarify the terms for the reader by making it known that his opinion is based on firsthand experience the author gives the reader facts about the area's animal and plant life both before and after the dam was built the construction of the glen canyon dam destroyed the area's natural habitat
who - is the article describing? what - is the main point? when - is the author taking me as a reader? where - did this happen? why - is the author making this point?
Making claims without evidence undermines the credibility of the author's argument. Providing evidence supports the claim, makes the argument more convincing, and helps readers understand the basis of the statement.
This is a question that might be found on a test in school. When asked what idea best supports the author's argument, the answer will be one that best shows something that supports the point the author is making.
An author might use a graph as a source in a written argument to visually represent data or trends, making complex information easier for readers to understand at a glance. Graphs can help strengthen the argument by providing concrete evidence and supporting the author's claims with visual representations of statistical relationships. They can also add credibility to the argument by showing that it is based on factual data.
the Colorado river that runs threw the grand canyon eroded away the ground for thousands of years eventually making the Grand Canyon
This is referred to as an ad hominem attack (Latin to the man), attempting to invalidate the argument by making charges against the person making the argument.
The fallacy in the argument presented is called ad hominem, which involves attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
The author of "Selling of Joseph" is Samuel Sewall, a judge, businessman, and Puritan theologian from Massachusetts. He wrote the booklet in 1700, making an early and powerful argument against slavery.
A convincing argument is supported by strong evidence, logical reasoning, and clear presentation. Additionally, considering counterarguments and addressing them effectively can also contribute to making an argument more convincing.