Well, isn't that just a happy little mistake! You see, saying "Rio Grande River" is a bit redundant because "Rio Grande" actually means "Big River" in Spanish. So, you can just call it the "Rio Grande" and everyone will know you're talking about that beautiful, big river flowing through the Southwest. Just a little something to remember for your next painting of the landscape!
Rio Grande river, also known as Rio Bravo in Mexico.
Rio
Rio
Rio
proximo ao rio Where proximo = near/close ao = the rio=river
999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999
assuming you are in Mexico which i do because you would be right that there are only 2 rivers in that case whereas if you were in Canada there would be far more than 2 the rivers you seek are the Rio bravo & the Rio Colorado in the united states the Rio bravo is called the Rio grande tho here the us border is called the Mexican border so if you had asked what 2 rivers form parts of the Mexican border then the better answer would have been the Rio grande & the Colorado river but only provided you were actually asking it in the united states for had you been in say Belize which also has a Mexican border the better answer would have been even more different etc etc
valle del rio.... (then the name of the river)
Big river ranch is "le ranch de la grande rivière" in French.
"Rio" written like this is the capital city of the Brazilian state of "Rio de Janeiro". Everyone in Portugal would recognize it that way. But in the context of a conversation the word could also mean river, because the word for river is "rio". But Portuguese people don't say the name of the river and then "rio", just say the name of the river. Everyone learn the names of the rivers in school so they are mentioned without the subject, like famous rivers such as "the Mississippi, etc (i'm portuguese)
Desejaria que eu tivesse um rio.
The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.