If the problem is to change 6 cups in a row of 3 full cups followed by 3 empty cups into alternately full and empty cups by moving only one cup:
Pick up the middle full cup, pour its contents into the middle empty cup and put it back where it was.
That is 30 ml.
One litre= 1,000 millilitres You need 2,700 more millilitres to fill it.
Using commas with introductory adverbs is a stylistic consideration. Using a comma in this situation is never incorrect, but many writers have recently started omitting the comma. You could also try moving the adverb around in the sentence, expunging this problem completely: instead of saying "Suddenly, the filled cup fell off the table," you could write "The filled cup suddenly fell off the table," or "The filled cup fell off the table suddenly."
You will get two to three cups of tortellini after cooking one cup of frozen tortellini. The cheese filled pastas increase in volume and weight by 2 percent-3 percent.
The cup is solid, but the water remains liquid unless you freeze it into ice.
When a cup is filled with boiling water, the heat from the water caused the material of the cup to experience thermal expansion. If the cup is badly made, then different parts of it will expand to different extents and this will create stresses in the material of the cup causing it to crack.
The cup bearer had a dream of a grapevine filled with grapes that he squeezed into Pharaoh's cup, and then handed the cup to Pharaoh .(Genesis 40:9-13)
The answer will depend on the size of the cup and, therefore, the quantity of water in it!
Both "full of" and "filled with" are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Full of" is typically used to describe a state of being, while "filled with" is used to indicate the action of pouring something into a space. For example, "The cup is full of water" versus "The cup is filled with water."
The cup was filled till the brim
if you pour one cup into the other cup you get a drink =)
-3