Nope. The Western Roman Empire fell in A.D 476.
Diocletian and Constantine did not contribute the the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. They were around 180-150 years before this. If anything, they postponed it because the former put an end to the military anarchy of the Crisis of the Third century and restored central authority and the latte further consolidated it. Clovis did not contribute to the fall of this part of the empire because when he conquered the rump state of the Romans in central France (the Kingdom of Soissons), this part of the empire was already dead letter.
The conventional date fro the end of the Pax Romana is 180, the year when the emperor Marcus Aurelius died. The conventional date given for the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years) is 476, the year when Romulus Augustus, the last emperor of the western part of the empire, was deposed. That makes 296 years.
constantinople
The Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius (121-180 AD).
There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.There was only one Roman empire and gladiatorial combat was held in both eastern and western parts of the empire.
This period of relative political stability within the Roman Empire has been called by historians Pax Romana (Roman Peace).
Pax Romana was not a people. These Latin words mean Roman peace. It refers to a 200 period of relative political stability in The Roman Empire which followed the civil wars which led to the fall of the Roman Republic and its replacement by rule by emperors. It lasted from 27 BC to 180 AD.
Historians have coined the term Pax Romana (Roman Peace) to indicate the 207-year period of relative political stability within the Roman Empire (27 BC-180 AD).
The number 180 in Roman numerals would be CLXXX
The Pax Ramona, also known as the Roman Peace, refers to a period of relative peace and stability that existed within the Roman Empire during the reign of Emperor Augustus. It lasted from 27 BC to 180 AD and was characterized by minimal military conflicts, improved infrastructure, and the spread of Roman culture throughout the empire. It was a time of consolidation and expansion for the Roman Empire.
Marcus Aurelius was the 16th Emperor of the Roman Empire as well as a Stoic philosopher. Born in 180 AD, he ruled the empire from 161 until his death.
The Roman Empire was in AD because Julius Caesar's grandnephew and adopted son became the first Roman emperor in 14 CE. I beg to differ for the following reasons: "The republic formed around 500 BC and around 100 BC it started to drift toward a dictatorship, 27 BC-180 BC Roman Empire held peace, a decline set in around 200 BC. Under Constantine Ist (306-337) he moved the capital to Byzantine, renamed Constantinople. Theodosius(379-395) last ruler of the united empire. From 376-410 the Goths (Ostrogoths and Visigoths, later) attacked and sacked Rome. Last Western emperor abdicated in 476." Therefore, the Roman Empire had its beginning in B.C. and fell in A.D.