Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
Yes. It has over 22 million, whereas Austria is just over 8 million.
I think you mean Australia instead of Austria, in which Australia is smaller than Europe in area.
Both Australia and New Zealand have more sheep than people.
Both New Zealand and Australia have more sheep than they have people.
Australia has far more sheep than people and is normally regarded as a continent in it self New Zealand also has a lot more sheep than people. It's located a bit East of Australia, and the combination of the two countries (and the pacific islands) is called Oceania, and is definitely a continent if Australia is not officially. Therefore Australia or Oceania is a continent with more sheep than people on it.
Sheep
Australia and New Zealand are known to have more sheeps and cattles than people.
The United States has 291,465,333 more people than Australia as of July 2011. America (South America- 400,832,004; North America- 548,720,568) has 927,785,861 more people than Australia as of July 2011.
No. In 2010, women make up just a little more than half of Australia's population.
Australia
The population of Chile at the start of 2011 is just shy of 17 million people, so Australia has over 5 million more.
In 2005 the estimated population of Hawaii was 1,275,194 and the population of Australia was 20,090,437.
More than one.