answersLogoWhite

0

During the 1930s, Italy and Germany were very aggressive towards other countries. The European democracies responded by letting them know they wouldn't tolerate the aggression.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Account for the responses of the European democracies to the military aggression by Italy and Germany during the 1930?

Europe had just finished with a horrific war and they were still recovering from it during the 1930's. The European democracies wanted to avoid another great war, and so they didn't interfere with Italy's and Germany's aggressions until they felt it was absolutely necessary.


Why didn't the western democracies stop the aggression?

Western democracies often hesitated to stop aggression due to a combination of factors, including the desire to maintain peace following the devastation of World War I, economic constraints, and a belief in diplomacy over military intervention. The policy of appeasement, particularly in the lead-up to World War II, reflected a hope that concessions could prevent larger conflicts. Additionally, the rise of authoritarian regimes and their aggressive actions were underestimated, leading to a delayed response until the threat became undeniable.


Why did the US turn to military action to stop communist aggression in Korea and Vietnam?

Stop communist aggression.


What Defensive military alliance meant to combat Soviet aggression abbr?

NATO


What acts of military aggression did serbs commit in bosnia and herzegovina and kosovo?

k


What is the comparison of communist aggression to Hitler's aggression in the 1930s?

It doesn't have to be Adolph, it could be any past conqueror. They all had one thing in common; military force to conquer. Ghengis Khan used horses, Hitler used tanks, the ends justified the means...they were doing the same thing...military aggression.


Should liberal democracies ever military intervene in other countries in response to human rights violations?

Yes


What is sanctioned and unsanctioned aggression?

Sanctioned aggression refers to aggressive actions that are officially approved or deemed acceptable by a governing body or authority, often justified by laws, policies, or social norms. This can include actions like military interventions or law enforcement responses. In contrast, unsanctioned aggression encompasses actions that are not authorized or accepted by any formal authority, often viewed as illegal or unethical, such as acts of violence or terrorism. The distinction lies in the legitimacy and approval of the aggressive actions by societal or institutional standards.


According to Churchill what approach should the western democracies take to defer Soviet Union?

Winston Churchill advocated for a strong and united front among Western democracies to deter the Soviet Union, emphasizing the importance of military readiness and firm diplomatic strategies. He believed that a clear demonstration of resolve, along with the maintenance of alliances, particularly through NATO, would discourage Soviet aggression. Churchill also stressed the need for a robust defense and the promotion of democratic values to counteract the spread of communism.


What is called this plan that US investing thirteen billion US dollars to europe?

The plan is called the European Deterrence Initiative (EDI), formerly known as the European Reassurance Initiative (ERI). The goal of EDI is to enhance the U.S. military presence in Europe to deter Russian aggression and strengthen NATO alliances.


The League of Nations did not prevent Germany and Italy Italian aggression against other nations because what?

The League of Nations failed to prevent German and Italian aggression primarily due to its lack of enforcement power and the absence of key nations, such as the United States. It struggled to achieve consensus among member countries, leading to ineffective responses to acts of aggression. Additionally, the League's reliance on collective security was undermined by the unwillingness of member states to commit military resources, allowing aggressor nations to act without fear of significant consequences.


Which of these responses to colonialism was supported by Ho Chi Minh but not Mohandas Gandhi?

Violent military conflicts