Puerto Ricans have the same rights as any other American Citizen. Residents of the island of Puerto Rico do not have direct representation in Congress, cannot vote in presidential elections and do not pay Federal Personal income tax on money earned on the territory (They pay every other sort of tax invented by man, just not Federal Personal Income tax). Puerto Ricans that move to one of the 50 states or DC can vote for president.
Puerto Ricans are citizens of the US by legislative act (1917 Jones Act), unlike citizens born in the 50 states which are constitutional citizens. The difference is that Federal legislation only requires a majority of the US House and Senate plus a presidential signature to repeal any existing law. The Constitution requires 75% of the existing state legislatures in the country and their governors to approve any change which is much more difficult. Theoretically, this means that Puerto Rican-born US Citizens could have their citizenship revoked if the political winds blow the wrong way. However there is a constitutional question here that would need to be tested: Is legislative citizenship fundamentally different than Constitutional citizenship?
It is also thought that some one Born in Puerto Rico may not be eligible to be President. However some think if the Puerto Rican-born US citizen has residency in one of the 50 states, there is no legal reason why that citizen couldn't run. This is a constitutional question that has not been tested. On two occasions viable presidential candidates born on territories, not states were defeated in the general election so no precedent has been set. The two candidates were Barry Goldwater who was born in the Territory that became Arizona, and John McCane who was born on the Panama Canal Zone when it was a US Territory.
A resident of any US territory not a state cannot be President of the United States. The Constitution also states that anyone who would be President must have resided in the United States for 14 years, but it is untested whether this means 14 years consecutive or commutative years. It also does not state whether the 14 years can be on US Territory or within a State.
True.
In a polis, residents can be categorized into citizens, who have full civic rights and are actively involved in the political life of the city-state; metics, who are free foreigners living in the polis but without full citizenship rights; and slaves, who are owned by citizens and have no political or legal rights.
Citizens have political rights; non-citizens do not
Citizens have political rights; non-citizens do not
True. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens by birth, as Puerto Rico is a territory of the United States. This citizenship grants them many of the same rights as citizens living in the 50 states, although they cannot vote in presidential elections while residing in Puerto Rico.
smh who knows?
No. Egypt has never established fundamental political equality between citizens of different religions. Especially in the case of Judaism, Egyptian Jews were explicitly denied citizenship until the mid-1970s in order to deny them their rights and prevent them from asserting pro-Zionist political beliefs.
Puerto Ricans have the same rights as US Citizens. Puerto Ricans do not have all the rights of a citizen of the 50 states. They do share many rights, but they don't share all of them. For example, they cannot vote, or have members in the senate. They also do not have to pay federal taxes
Citizens have political rights; non-citizens do not
Citizens have political rights; non-citizens do not
There are different documents and papers that describe a citizens rights. The best document to find such rights is the constitution.
In the 1700's, British citizens had several rights including civil and political rights. They also had several economic, social, and cultural rights.