I think the treaty system should continue and i think all countries need to do their bit and look after Antarctica as it is very precious and needs protecting as it holds many important resources and if "Global Warming" gets worse the ice could melt and would cause an intense rise in sea levels which would result in the flooding of Low Lying countries.
Tourism is sustainable, because tourists take out their own garbage and tread lightly on the continent.
It could destroy an almost untouched land and there are no hotels or resorts
No. Tourism is not sustainable in Antarctica, because sustainability implies a cycle. People who tour to Antarctica come on cruise ships, where they sleep and eat. Daily, they leave the cruise ships in zodiacs, to trek upon the continent, and visit penguin colonies, abandoned whaling stations, and other sites. They spend no money there; there are no native peoples or crafts to benefit from tourism. The perfect tourist leaves only footprints, and then only where footprints are allowed.
All tourism in Antarctica takes place on the vessels that sail into Antarctic waters. There are no tourist facilities on the continent. Tourism is managed by the tour operators in sustainable ways, because they follow rather strict guidelines for dumping waste at sea, accessing the continent, enforcing zero littering protocols and so forth. Because all that is taken from Antarctica are visible views, there is really nothing in these phenomenon to sustain that doesn't already exist.
sustainable or eco tourism
Simplified, it's tourism that could conceptually go on forever, i.e. tourism that doesn't use up any resources at a faster rate that they are replenished.
Global Partnership for Sustainable Tourism was created in 2010.
cuz
me
no
Sustainable tourism means going to a place as a tourist, and trying to only make a positive impact on the environment. An example of this could be someone who goes on an alternative spring break, and does a project that will help the land.
No. Tourism can be sustainable.