0
What else can I help you with?
How did becoming king in England and France differ from how it was done in the Holy Roman Empire?
The kings inherited their titles. The Holy Roman Emperor was elected.
Why did becoming king in England and France differ from how it was done in the holy roman empire?
Becoming king in England and France was often a more centralized and hereditary process, with clear lines of succession, typically based on family ties and dynastic claims. In contrast, the Holy Roman Empire operated under a more decentralized and elective monarchy, where the emperor was chosen by a group of princes and electors, leading to a more complex and politically negotiated ascension. This difference reflects the varying political structures and feudal systems in each region, with England and France consolidating power within singular monarchies, while the Holy Roman Empire maintained a fragmented authority among various local rulers.
How did the political development of the Holy Roman Empire differ from that of England and France?
The political development of the Holy Roman Empire was characterized by a decentralized structure with a multitude of semi-autonomous territories and a weak central authority, often leading to conflicts among princes and the emperor. In contrast, England and France moved toward more centralized monarchies, where kings consolidated power and established stronger national governments. While England developed a parliamentary system and legal frameworks like the Magna Carta, France saw the rise of absolute monarchy. This divergence resulted in different governance models and political stability in England and France compared to the fragmented nature of the Holy Roman Empire.
How did the distribution of power in medieval England differ from that of medieval France?
France did not develop an institution that could limit the power of the king.
How might France's goals for the postwar settlement differ from US goals?
France's goals for the post war settlement differ from the U.S because France wanted to prevent Germany from becoming a world power. And the U.S wanted to keep Britain from falling apart
How did the situations of France and Britain differ by the fall of 1940?
The situation in in France became the fall of France in 1940 with the Nazi invasion. There was also a battle in Britain as Hitler tried to invade England.
How did the growth of constitutional monarchy in England differ from the development of absolute monarchy in France Spain and Russia?
England was experiencing internal conflict between different political leaders, while France, Spain, and Russia were mostly at peace.
How did France and England differ in the how their monarchies ruled?
English monarchs ruled with parliament and also recognized parliament as the ultimate authority.
How did France and England differ in how their monarchies ruled?
English monarchs ruled with parliament and also recognized parliament as the ultimate authority.
Why was England so powerful?
Probably in the 18th and 19th Centuries when Britain acquired a large Empire. Opinions will differ on the interpretation of this question.
How did the Persian Empire differ from the Babylonian Empire?
It took it over and incorporated it.
How did the land controlled by the Roman empire and the Holy Roman empire differ?
How do i know. its my homework
