During the Cambodian genocide from 1975 to 1979, the U.S. response was largely marked by inaction and a lack of direct intervention. The U.S. had previously supported the Khmer Rouge's rise to power as a counter to the Vietnamese influence in the region, but once the genocide began, the U.S. did not take significant measures to stop it. Humanitarian efforts were limited, and the U.S. government remained focused on its geopolitical interests in Southeast Asia. After the fall of the Khmer Rouge, the U.S. did eventually provide some support for the Cambodian government and engaged in efforts to bring attention to the atrocities that occurred.
No, It was the Pol Pot government as he turned into an extremist Darwinian, he took the "Survival of the fittest" motto to heart as Hitler and Stalin did.
Because of Cambodian Genocide or Khmer Rouge.
The US in the early 20th century was isolationist and could not have cared less about the Armenian Genocide. As a result, the US did nothing.
None during the genocide of 1994
which genocide?
Generally speaking, the US ignored those genocides. However, since the US was already fighting Nazi Germany, it ended up stopping the Holocaust. However, the US did nothing in regards to the Cambodian genocide (which was stopped by the recent US enemy: Vietnam) and nearly nothing with regards to the Rwandan genocide, which was stopped by Rwandans opposed to the government and French-led UN forces.
Cambodian money is called Riel. Exchange rate is about 4000 Riels to 1 US dollar.
regulations
The Iraq genocide represents a series of events in which US Marines and the British Armed Forces systematically executed civillian personell at the time during and just after the Gulf war. The whole genocide was later pushed under the rug by State Department and CIA.
the usa is modern than cambodia
mass-murder
NOTING