The U.S. measured success in Vietnam primarily through military objectives, such as body counts of enemy combatants and territorial control. The belief was that inflicting heavy casualties on the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces would lead to a favorable outcome. Additionally, the U.S. sought to demonstrate political stability in South Vietnam and the efficacy of its military strategy. However, these metrics often failed to capture the complex socio-political realities of the conflict, leading to a controversial assessment of success.
Body count became the measure of success in a war of attrition.
Australia was the partner of the US; when we went in, so did they. When we left, they left. Our success, mirrored their success.
Measure of Success of EconomyYes, the GNP is the measure of success of an economy.
Depends on how you chose to define the word "success".
1. US military men had never been defeated by another nation, they had just won WWII. These same men would lead the US in Vietnam. 2. The US/UN had successfully stopped communist aggression in Korea (1950-1953); success breeds success...the US will stop the communists again in Vietnam. 3. The US "BELIEVED" in firepower...for winning wars; the US had more firepower than any nation on earth. The US would use it. If the enemy escalated...so would the US; and the US would win...thru FIREPOWER!
Its success is a measure of the habitat it occupies.
Measure of Success of EconomyYes, the GNP is the measure of success of an economy.
The US never invaded Vietnam.
South Vietnam was considered an ally of the US.
US Military personnel were in Vietnam from 1955 thru 1975.
See: Vietnam
Vietnam