In medieval England, power was more centralized under the monarchy, particularly after the Norman Conquest in 1066, which led to a strong royal authority and a system of feudalism that supported the king's control. In contrast, medieval France experienced a more fragmented power structure, with powerful local nobles often challenging royal authority and maintaining significant autonomy. This decentralization in France sometimes resulted in conflicts between the monarchy and feudal lords, while England's stronger central government allowed for a more unified realm. Additionally, England's development of parliamentary institutions in the late medieval period further differentiated its political landscape from that of France.
France did not develop an institution that could limit the power of the king.
The situation in in France became the fall of France in 1940 with the Nazi invasion. There was also a battle in Britain as Hitler tried to invade England.
England was experiencing internal conflict between different political leaders, while France, Spain, and Russia were mostly at peace.
English monarchs ruled with parliament and also recognized parliament as the ultimate authority.
English monarchs ruled with parliament and also recognized parliament as the ultimate authority.
How does what differ? This question needs to be rewritten.
The kings inherited their titles. The Holy Roman Emperor was elected.
The kings inherited their titles. The Holy Roman Emperor was elected.
From what or whom?
UNVA....?
During the eighteenth century, the French people were split up into three groups; the clergy, noblemen, and peasents, but during the medieval times of France, there were two social groups of people, the smart and the dumb.
Big Machines