answersLogoWhite

0

To hell with Pakistan and you...

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the opposite of judicial activism?

judicial restraintFor more information, see Related Questions, below.


What is sources of authority?

Judicial Activism


How does judicial activism and judicial restraint affect the separation of powers?

Judicial activism weakens the separation of powers by involving the Court in what are traditionally executive and legislative functions. Judicial restraint reinforces separation of powers.


Contrast original intent with judicial activism?

The main types of contrasting judicial philosophies include judicial activism versus. Versus strict constructionism, and living document versus original intent.


What is judicial restraint?

Judicial restraint is the philosophy that judges and justices should defer to written legislation whenever possible, if it is not in conflict with the Constitution. A justice who uses judicial restraint tends to take a narrower view of the Constitution and does not attempt to broaden the definition of Amendments to fit a particular social or political agenda. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. For more information on the debate between judicial activism and judicial restrain, see Related Links, below.


The idea that judges should use their power broadly to further justice based ontheir own personal views or agenda is called?

judicial activism!


What Judicial philosophy states that the court should uphold acts of the Congress unless acts violate specific provisions of the Constitution?

Judicial restraint. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism.For more information about the controversy over judicial activism and judicial restraint, see Related Questions, below.


What was the marshall court best known for?

for its period of Judicial Activism


Was Judicial Activism or Judicial Restraint used in the Tinker v Des Moines case?

Judicial activism was used because the Court ruled that the school policy prohibiting the students from wearing the arm bands to protest symbolically the Vietnam War violated the students' free speech rights. By overturning a policy of the government (the public school's policy), the Court exercised judicial activism.


Who favors judicial activism?

A person who favors judicial activism is one who prefers a decision to be made via a personal opinion, rather than focusing on the law. A person who does this is considered unlawful or a federalist.


Compare Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism?

Judicial restraint is the theory that judges should limit their exercise of power and strike down laws only when they are obviously unconstitutional, and always follow precedents set by older courts. Judicial activism is the opposite view, and is sometimes meant to imply politically motivated judicial decisions.


Did the Warren Court believe in judicial activism or judicial restraint?

The Warren Court, which was active from 1953 until Chief Justice Earl Warren retired in 1969, is often accused of judicial activism for its many decisions supporting African-Americans' civil rights. Whether they believed they were judicial activists or not is unknown.