Francisco "Pancho" Villa is a complex historical figure often viewed through varying perspectives. To some, he is seen as a folk hero and revolutionary leader who fought for the rights of the oppressed and sought to redistribute land to poor peasants in early 20th-century Mexico. Conversely, others view him as a bandit and ruthless leader due to his violent tactics and involvement in numerous conflicts, including raids into the United States. Ultimately, whether he is perceived as a "good" or "bad" guy depends on one's interpretation of his actions and their impact on Mexican society.
Clint eastwood
BIMINGHAM are sooo bad they are not in the prem an ASTON VILLA are a lot better ASTON VILLA:5v1:BIMINGHAM ...tipical vile ...there is a R in BIRMINGHAM! villa arnt real Brummys! end of
What I meant was WAS Francisco Pizzaro a bad man! My bad :P
Pancho villa did more positive than negative things.He had to fight for his country Mexico. He had to do something abut the poor society.
0 because they are a very bad team not as good as arsenal mate lol mr Liam rodgers of banbury also hates them so much
For my opinion, it would be either Wolverhampton Wanderers or Aston Villa. Wanderers because they have bad defenders. And as for Aston Villa, they had Emile Heskey which had pulled them down to the crappy zone.
good
Bad And Good
good and bad
yes and there are good people and there are bad people. the bad bad bad people love the Satan and the good good people love god and i am from the good people.
Bad, because he was raised by his grandparents and his education was neglected.
Not too bad i studied it in Social Studies