Yes it is. Mt Cook/Aoraki in New Zealand has an elevation of 3754 m, while Mt Kosciuszko in Australia is only 2228 m high.
Mount Cook, also known as Aoraki, is taller than Mount Kosciuszko. Mount Cook stands at 3,724 meters (12,218 feet), making it the highest peak in New Zealand. In contrast, Mount Kosciuszko, the highest peak in Australia, reaches 2,228 meters (7,310 feet). Therefore, Mount Cook is significantly taller than Mount Kosciuszko.
Yes. Mt Kosciuszko, Australia's highest mountain, has an elevation of 2,228m (or 2,229m as quoted by some sources). Aoraki/Mt Cook, New Zealand's highest mountain, has an elevation of 3,754m.
Mount Everest sits at 8848 Metres above sea level, while Mount Kosciuszko sits at 2228 metres above sea level. Making Everest 6620 metres higher than Kosciuszko.
Mount Cook is 1526m higher than Mt Kosciusko!
1526 metres
Mount Kosciuszko, the highest peak in Australia, stands at 2,228 meters (7,310 feet) above sea level. In contrast, Death Valley is known for its low elevation, with Badwater Basin being the lowest point in North America at 86 meters (282 feet) below sea level. Therefore, Mount Kosciuszko is approximately 2,314 meters (7,610 feet) higher than Death Valley's lowest point.
NO..K2 will never be bigger than mt.everest
no but its much higher
mount mcknley
Yes
Yes It Is 100ft. taller
about as 50% chance that mount saint helens' eruption is way bigger than mount fuji