No, the Missouri Compromise did not involve whether the Missouri River would be the border of the state. Instead, it was an agreement made in 1820 to address the balance of free and slave states in the Union. The compromise allowed Missouri to enter as a slave state while Maine entered as a free state, and it established a line at latitude 36°30′ north to determine the future status of slavery in other territories.
The decision of whether to admit the new South Western territories to the Union as slave-states or free soil. The Compromise allowed no new slave-states North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border.
The Missouri Compromise coved the issue of slavery in the United States at that time. The compromise gave all the let the land south of the Missouri state border to be able to choose to have slaves, while all states north of that border had to be free states.
all the rest of the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern border of Missouri.
it ran across the border of Mexico
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery in the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands north of the 36°30′ parallel, which was Missouri's southern border, except for the state of Missouri itself.
West of its border. this was later repealed
The border between slave states and free states
No - in the North. It banned slavery anywhere North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border. This was a successful compromise which kept the peace for thirty years.
It sounds like the Missouri Compromise, where slavery would be permitted 'not north' of Missouri's Southern border.
The Missouri Compromise - a line of latitude fixed at Missouri's Southern border.
Yes. It was Missouri's Southern border that became the parallel.
No new slave-states North of the parallel that marked Missouri's Southern border. But this only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase. After the Mexican War, a new compromise had to be worked out.